Executive Pay-performance Sensitivity and Mandatory Upper Limits

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Ziyang [1 ]
Qi, Di [1 ]
Zhang, Mengwei [1 ]
Mang, Yingyue [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, 24 South Sect 1,Yihuan Rd, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Executive pay-performanee sensitivity; Stateowned enterprises; Government intervention; Mandatory upper limit of compensations; COMPENSATION; BEHAVIOR; FIRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In 2009 and 2015, during the reform of state-owned enterprises, Chinese government introduced mandatory upper limits of executive compensation to resound to public outrage of excessive executive compensation. However, the limits were cancelled in 2018. Lsing Difference in Difference method, this paper empirically examines the changes of executive pay performance sensitivity after the cancellation of mandatory upper limits in 2018 for the first time. The results provide evidences that after the cancellation, executive pay performance sensitivity increases and moreover, the stronger ability the executive has, the more executive pay -performance sensitivity increases. It suggests that direct government intervention on executive compensation restricts large payoffs for exceptional performance and thus weakens incentives provided by compensation packages. In the circumstances where managers are excellent, the negative effect of mandatory upper limits on incentives is more obvious. These findings provide theoretical and empirical support for the new round of reform of compensation system of state-owned enterprises in China and helps for the policy makers to reevaluate the rationale of setting a mandatory upper limit.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 141
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Executive Pay-Performance Sensitivity and Litigation
    Dai, Zhonglan
    Jin, Li
    Zhang, Weining
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (01) : 152 - 177
  • [2] Effect of CEO Power on Executive Pay-Performance Sensitivity: A literature Review
    Zhang, Changzheng
    Gao, Zhuoqin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION AND MEDICINE (EMIM 2015), 2015, 8 : 476 - 481
  • [3] Air pollution and executive incentive: Evidence from pay-performance sensitivity
    Yu, Shuangli
    Shen, Yuxin
    Zhang, Fan
    Shen, Yongjian
    Xu, Zefeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 82
  • [4] Corporate digital transformation, governance shifts and executive pay-performance sensitivity
    Li, Zhigang
    Xie, Bingyuan
    Chen, Ximing
    Fu, Qilong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 92
  • [5] COMPENSATION CONTRACTS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS - DETERMINANTS OF PAY-PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY
    LIPPERT, RL
    MOORE, WT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 1994, 17 (03) : 321 - 332
  • [6] TOO MUCH PAY-PERFORMANCE SENSITIVITY?
    Brick, Ivan E.
    Palmon, Oded
    Wald, John K.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 94 (01) : 287 - 303
  • [7] Pay-performance sensitivity and production uncertainty
    Zabojnik, J
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 53 (03) : 291 - 296
  • [8] CEO pay-performance sensitivity and pay for luck and asymmetry
    Ning, Yixi
    Hu, Bill
    Xu, Zhi
    [J]. MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2024,
  • [9] CEO control, corporate performance and pay-performance sensitivity
    Amzaleg, Yaron
    Azar, Ofer H.
    Ben-Zion, Uri
    Rosenfeld, Ahron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2014, 106 : 166 - 174
  • [10] CEO prior uncertainty and pay-performance sensitivity
    Lee, Jiyoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 2023, 46 (04) : 1021 - 1045