Westminster's Brexit Paradox: The contingency of the 'old' versus 'new' politics

被引:20
|
作者
Richards, Dave [1 ]
Diamond, Patrick [2 ]
Wager, Alan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Social Sci, Dept Polit, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Polit & Int Relat, London, England
关键词
anti-politics; Brexit; British Political Tradition; new politics; political reform; Westminster model; NEW-LABOR; DEMOCRACY; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1177/1369148119830009
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The embedded nature of the British Political Tradition has created a series of pathologies about the way politics in Westminster is conducted. The endurance of the British Political Tradition emanates from its resilience to pressures for reform. Yet the rising anti-politics tide, the expression of which was vented in the 2016 European Union referendum, presents a critical challenge to the British Political Tradition. Given the political instability resulting from Brexit, this article maps the fate of previous attempts to reform the way politics is conducted in Britain. It identifies two waves of 'new politics' that have defined themselves against the 'old politics' of the British Political Tradition: the first, a series of demands for reform during the 1970s; the second, a sustained call for political reform from the 1990s onwards. The subsequent analysis reveals a link between both waves in demands for a less 'elitist' and more participatory style of democracy, but at the same time, a failure to dislodge the core tenets of the British Political Tradition. Given the current state of British politics, the article considers whether calls for a new form of politics in response to the climate of anti-politics, and the need for a post-Brexit settlement, will suffer a similar fate.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 348
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Brexit and Westminster's "Ulsterior Motives"
    Rodden, John
    [J]. SOCIETY, 2019, 56 (04) : 322 - 326
  • [2] Brexit and Westminster’s “Ulsterior Motives”
    John Rodden
    [J]. Society, 2019, 56 : 322 - 326
  • [3] Brexit, Post-liberalism, and the Politics of Paradox
    Pabst, Adrian
    [J]. TELOS, 2016, (176): : 189 - 201
  • [4] Brexit and new autochthonic politics of belonging
    Cassidy, Kathryn
    Innocenti, Perla
    Buerkner, Hans-Joachim
    [J]. SPACE AND POLITY, 2018, 22 (02) : 188 - 204
  • [5] Old Politics versus New Politics: The Dynamics of Malay Politics in the Johor State Election 2022
    Halim, Shah Mohd Akmal Abdul
    [J]. GLOBAL JOURNAL AL-THAQAFAH, 2022, 12 (01) : 117 - +
  • [6] Brexit's identity politics and the question of subjectivity
    Mintchev, Nikolay
    Moore, Henrietta L.
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYSIS CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (04) : 452 - 472
  • [7] Performance, Politics and Boris Johnson's Brexit
    Senior, Carl
    Stewart, Patrick
    Bucy, Erik
    Lee, Nick
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] Brexit’s identity politics and the question of subjectivity
    Nikolay Mintchev
    Henrietta L. Moore
    [J]. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 2019, 24 : 452 - 472
  • [9] What's the subject? Brexit and politics as articulation
    Clarke, John
    Newman, Janet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [10] New versus Old Politics in Podemos: Feminization and Masculinized Party Discourse
    Caravantes, Paloma
    [J]. MEN AND MASCULINITIES, 2019, 22 (03) : 465 - 490