Female and male adult brush mice (Peromyscus boylii) use ultrasonic vocalizations in the wild

被引:21
|
作者
Petric, R. [1 ]
Kalcounis-Rueppell, M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] UNCG, Dept Biol, Greensboro, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
USV; wild; nocturnal; mouse; field; MUS-MUSCULUS; BEHAVIOR; COURTSHIP; RATS;
D O I
10.1163/1568539X-00003118
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We examined the individual context of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) produced by free-living wild male and female adult brush mice (Peromyscus boylii). We tested the hypothesis that USV production is dependent on behavioral context, and is important during both adult male and female interactions. Our methods included a 12-channel microphone array, radio-telemetry and thermal imaging that allowed us to determine: (1) who produced USVs, (2) characteristics of USVs, (3) type of USVs, (4) behavioral context of USVs and (5) the identity of the second mouse if an individual was not alone when a USV was produced. Females vocalized as much as males and produced the same types of USVs as males. There were no differences between spectral characteristics of male and female USVs. Females and males vocalized in the presence of one another. Importantly, when females were together they vocalized more than expected based on the proportion of time they spent together. Our results suggest that, in addition to facilitating courtship and mating, USVs are general territorial calls for neighbors because females vocalized in the presence of their neighbors. Despite a large literature on laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) USVs, studies are heavily biased towards males. Our results on brush mice, a species with a similar breeding system to the lab mouse and other rodents, suggest that female-female communication is an important and underappreciated component of the evolution and maintenance of mouse USVs.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1766
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Production of ultrasonic vocalizations by Peromyscus mice in the wild
    Kalcounis-Rueppell M.C.
    Metheny J.D.
    Vonhof M.J.
    Frontiers in Zoology, 3 (1)
  • [2] Habitat use by brush mice (Peromyscus boylii) in southeastern Arizona
    Gottesman, AB
    Morrison, ML
    Krausman, PR
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 64 (02) : 259 - 264
  • [3] The Influence of Habitat Type on the Reproductive Success of Brush Mice (Peromyscus boylii)
    Strom, M. K.
    Mabry, K. E.
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 60 : E424 - E424
  • [4] Differences in Ultrasonic Vocalizations between Wild and Laboratory California Mice (Peromyscus californicus)
    Kalcounis-Rueppell, Matina C.
    Petric, Radmila
    Briggs, Jessica R.
    Carney, Catherine
    Marshall, Matthew M.
    Willse, John T.
    Rueppell, Olav
    Ribble, David O.
    Crossland, Janet P.
    PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (03):
  • [5] Differences in ultrasonic vocalizations between male and female mice
    Nishimura, Yutaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 262 - 262
  • [6] FEMALE BEHAVIOR IS AFFECTED BY MALE ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATIONS IN HOUSE MICE
    POMERANTZ, SM
    NUNEZ, AA
    BEAN, NJ
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1983, 31 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [7] Playback of broadband vocalizations of female mice suppresses male ultrasonic calls
    Hood, Kayleigh E. E.
    Long, Eden
    Navarro, Eric
    Hurley, Laura M. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [8] ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATIONS IN MALE DEER MICE (PEROMYSCUS-MANICULATUS-BAIRDI) - THEIR ROLE IN MALE SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR
    POMERANTZ, SM
    CLEMENS, LG
    PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1981, 27 (05) : 869 - 872
  • [9] Prelimbic cortex responds to male ultrasonic vocalizations in the presence of a male pheromone in female mice
    Asaba, Akari
    Nomoto, Kensaku
    Osakada, Takuya
    Matsuo, Tomohiko
    Kobayakawa, Ko
    Kobayakawa, Reiko
    Touhara, Kazushige
    Mogi, Kazutaka
    Kikusui, Takefumi
    FRONTIERS IN NEURAL CIRCUITS, 2022, 16
  • [10] Ultrasonic vocalizations and ontogenetic development in California mice (Peromyscus californicus)
    Vieira, ML
    Brown, RE
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2002, 59 (03) : 147 - 156