Fads or Facts? Sifting Through the Evidence to Find What Really Works

被引:5
|
作者
Konrad, Moira [1 ]
Criss, Caitlin J. [1 ]
Telesman, Alana Oif [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, A358 PAES Bldg,305 Annie & John Glenn Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
evidence-based practice; evidence-based education; high-incidence disabilities; data-based decision making; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1177/1053451218819234
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Despite the requirement that teachers implement evidence-based instruction in their classrooms, a significant research-to-practice gap persists. Far too often, teachers resort to quick fixes found through online searches or rely on conventional wisdom to make instructional decisions. This is no surprise as identifying evidence-based interventions can be time-consuming, overwhelming, and confusing. Indeed, claims of practices being evidence based are ubiquitous, even for practices that clearly lack evidence to support their efficacy. In addition, once an evidence-based practice is selected, the process for implementing it and evaluating its effectiveness can be an additional challenge. The purposes of this article are to distinguish between an evidence-based practice as an instructional strategy and evidence-based education as a problem-solving process and to assist teachers in identifying, implementing, and evaluating evidence-based practices in their classrooms.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 279
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条