Functional proteomics characterization of residual triple-negative breast cancer after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:30
|
作者
Sohn, J. [1 ]
Do, K. A. [2 ]
Liu, S. [1 ]
Chen, H. [1 ]
Mills, G. B. [3 ]
Hortobagyi, G. N. [1 ]
Meric-Bernstam, F. [4 ]
Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Syst Biol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol FMB, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
neoadjuvant chemotherapy; molecular characterization; residual disease; resistance; triple receptor-negative breast cancer; FACTOR-BINDING PROTEIN-2; TRASTUZUMAB RESISTANCE; MAMMALIAN TARGET; PI3K PATHWAY; ACTIVATION; INHIBITION; AKT; SURVIVAL; OVEREXPRESSION; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdt248
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In this study, we used functional proteomics to determine the molecular characteristics of residual triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NCT) and their relationship with patient outcomes in order to identify potential targets for therapy. Protein was extracted from 54 residual TNBCs, and 76 proteins related to breast cancer signaling were measured by reverse phase protein arrays (RPPAs). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were fitted for each protein. Survival outcomes were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. Training and cross validation were carried out. The coefficients estimated from the multivariable Cox model were used to calculate a risk score (RS) for each sample. Multivariable analysis using the top 25 proteins from univariable analysis at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.3 showed that AKT, IGFBP2, LKB1, S6 and Stathmin were predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). The cross-validation model was reproducible. The RS model calculated based on the multivariable analysis was -1.1086 x AKT + 0.2501 x IGFBP2 - 0.6745 x LKB1+1.0692 x S6 + 1.4086 x stathmin with a corresponding area under the curve, AUC = 0.856. The RS was an independent predictor of RFS (HR = 3.28, 95%CI = 2.07-5.20, P < 0.001). We found a five-protein model that independently predicted RFS risk in patients with residual TNBC disease. The PI3 K pathway may represent potential therapeutic targets in this resistant disease.
引用
收藏
页码:2522 / 2526
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Residual cancer burden and neoangiogenesis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
    Miyashita, M.
    Sasano, H.
    Tamaki, K.
    Hirakawa, H.
    Ishida, T.
    Ohuchi, N.
    BREAST, 2017, 32 : S100 - S101
  • [2] Functional proteomics characterization of residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy
    Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M.
    Liu, S.
    Chen, H.
    Chavez-MacGregor, M.
    Sahin, A.
    Hortobagyi, G. N.
    Mills, G. B.
    Do, K. -A.
    Meric-Bernstam, F.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2013, 24 (04) : 909 - 916
  • [3] Prognostic Factors for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with Residual Disease after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Li, Zhijun
    Han, Yiqun
    Wang, Jiayu
    Xu, Binghe
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [4] Pathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic markers in residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Ilie, Silvia Mihaela
    Briot, Nathalie
    Constatin, Guillaume
    Ilie, Alis
    Beltjens, Francoise
    Ladoire, Sylvain
    Desmoulins, Isabelle
    Hennequin, Audrey
    Bertaut, Aurelie
    Coutant, Charles
    Causeret, Sylvain
    Ghozali, Niama
    Coudert, Bruno
    Arnould, Laurent
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [5] Pathologic and immunohistochemical prognostic score in residual triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Ilie, S. M.
    Arnould, L.
    Briot, N.
    Desmoulins, I.
    Hennequin, A.
    Kaderbhai, C.
    Bertaut, A.
    Coutant, C.
    Causeret, S.
    Loustalot, C.
    Ilie, A.
    Derangere, V.
    Ladoire, S.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S432 - S432
  • [6] Genomic change in residual triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Aguilar-Mahecha, Adriana
    Przybytkowski, Ewa
    Lafleur, Josiane
    Lan, Cathy
    Legare, Stephanie
    Alirezaie, Najmeh
    Seguin, Carole
    Discepola, Federico
    Kovacina, Bojan
    Mihalcioiu, Catalin
    Robidoux, Andre
    Marcus, Elizabeth
    Roy, Josee Anne
    Pelmus, Manuela
    Aleynikova, Olga
    Nabavi, Sheida
    Majewski, Jacek
    Basik, Mark
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [7] The immune landscape of residual triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I.
    Sanchez, Violeta
    Salgado, Roberto
    Bordeaux, Jennifer
    Kim, Ju Y.
    Vaupel, Christine
    Gomez, Henry
    Sanders, Melinda E.
    Balko, Justin M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [8] Transcriptomic changes in invasive residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer
    Orozco, Javier
    Manughian-Peter, Ayla
    Gago, Francisco
    Chang, Grace
    Grumley, Janie
    Marzese, Diego
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : 23 - 24
  • [9] Extent of Breast Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Benson, John R.
    Dumitru, Dorin
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (08) : 784 - 785
  • [10] Are Platinum Drugs Ineffective for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer With Residual Invasive Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?
    Shimanuki, Yumiko
    Shimomura, Akihiko
    Yoshimura, Kenichi
    Terakado, Hiroyuki
    Shimizu, Chikako
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (31) : 3521 - +