Quantitative critical thinking: Student activities using Bayesian updating

被引:6
|
作者
Warren, Aaron R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ Northwest, Dept Chem & Phys, 1401 S US-421, Westville, IN 46391 USA
关键词
PHYSICS;
D O I
10.1119/1.5012750
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
One of the central roles of physics education is the development of students' ability to evaluate proposed hypotheses and models. This ability is important not just for students' understanding of physics but also to prepare students for future learning beyond physics. In particular, it is often hoped that students will better understand the manner in which physicists leverage the availability of prior knowledge to guide and constrain the construction of new knowledge. Here, we discuss how the use of Bayes' Theorem to update the estimated likelihood of hypotheses and models can help achieve these educational goals through its integration with evaluative activities that use hypothetico-deductive reasoning. Several types of classroom and laboratory activities are presented that engage students in the practice of Bayesian likelihood updating on the basis of either consistency with experimental data or consistency with pre-established principles and models. This approach is sufficiently simple for introductory physics students while offering a robust mechanism to guide relatively sophisticated student reflection concerning models, hypotheses, and problem-solutions. A quasi-experimental study utilizing algebra-based introductory courses is presented to assess the impact of these activities on student epistemological development. The results indicate gains on the Epistemological Beliefs Assessment for Physical Science (EBAPS) at a minimal cost of class time. (C) 2018 American Association of Physics Teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:368 / 380
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Bayesian updating activities on student epistemologies
    Warren, Aaron R.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01):
  • [2] Updating student model using Bayesian network and item response theory
    Nouh, Yaser
    Karthikeyani, P.
    Nadarajan, R.
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SENSING AND INFORMATION PROCESSSING, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 161 - +
  • [3] Quantitative methods: Bayesian inference, Bayesian thinking
    Withers, SD
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (04) : 553 - 566
  • [4] Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating
    Tappin, Ben M.
    Pennycook, Gordon
    Rand, David G.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2020, 204
  • [5] Nursing student the critical thinking development of the critical thinking education
    Yildirim, Belgin
    Ozsoy, Suheyla Altug
    [J]. HEALTHMED, 2011, 5 (04): : 846 - 856
  • [6] Critical Thinking with Sally Student
    Ayayo, Karelynne
    [J]. TEACHING THEOLOGY AND RELIGION, 2014, 17 (03): : 221 - 221
  • [7] Updating Bayesian(s): A Critical Evaluation of Bayesian Process Tracing
    Zaks, Sherry
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 29 (01) : 58 - 74
  • [8] Student Evaluation Using an Intellectual Standards Rubric for Critical Thinking
    Johnson, David
    Kakar, Rishtya
    Zahrndt, Robin
    Walton, Pete
    [J]. PEDAGOGY IN HEALTH PROMOTION, 2023, 9 (02) : 92 - 100
  • [9] Critical thinking activities in fluid mechanics - A case study for enhanced student learning and performance
    Cossu, Remo
    Awidi, Isaiah
    Nagy, Joseph
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2024, 46 : 35 - 42
  • [10] CRITICAL THINKING DEVELOPMENT IN MIDDLE SCHOOLS USING STS ACTIVITIES
    FYFFE, DW
    [J]. BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 1987, 7 (5-6) : 765 - 768