Testing trade-off and pecking order theories financing SMEs

被引:152
|
作者
Lopez-Gracia, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Sogorb-Mira, Francisco
机构
[1] Univ CEU Cardenal Herrera, Dept Econ & Empresa, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Valencia, Fac Econ, Valencia 46071, Spain
关键词
pecking order; trade-off; capital structure; Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises;
D O I
10.1007/s11187-007-9088-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores two of the most important theories behind financial policy in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs), namely, the pecking order and the trade-off theories. Panel data methodology is used to test empirical hypotheses on a sample of 3,569 Spanish SMEs over a 10-year period dating from 1995 to 2004. Results suggest that both theoretical models help to explain SME capital structure. However, despite finding clear evidence that SMEs follow a funding source hierarchy (pecking order model), our results reveal that greater trust is placed in SMEs that aim to reach target or optimum leverage (trade-off model). This remains true even when SMEs take a long time to reach this level, due to the high transaction costs they have to face. Non-debt tax shields (NDTS), growth opportunities and internal resources all seem to play an important role in determining SME capital structure. Both size and age are also found to be significant factors. Moreover, the empirical evidence obtained confirms that SMEs clearly behave differently to large firms where financing is concerned.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 136
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing trade-off and pecking order theories financing SMEs
    José López-Gracia
    Francisco Sogorb-Mira
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2008, 31 : 117 - 136
  • [2] SMEs capital structure: trade-off or pecking order theory: a systematic review
    Martinez, Lisana B.
    Scherger, Valeria
    Belen Guercio, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 26 (01) : 105 - 132
  • [3] Tests of Capital Structure "Static Trade-off" and "Pecking Order" Theories in Iran
    Mojtahedzadeh, Vida
    Asl, Zahra Nejati
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FINANCIAL AND ACTUARIAL MATHEMATICS - FAM-2011, 2011, : 86 - 90
  • [4] Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt
    Fama, EF
    French, KR
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2002, 15 (01): : 1 - 33
  • [5] Sustainability of Both Pecking Order and Trade-Off Theories in Chinese Manufacturing Firms
    Huu Manh Nguyen
    Thi Huong Giang Vuong
    Thi Huong Nguyen
    Wu, Yang-Che
    Wong, Wing-Keung
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
  • [6] The Determinants of the Capital Structure of SMEs in the Portuguese Manufacturing Industry: An Analysis According to the Principles of the Pecking Order and Trade-Off Theories
    Peixoto, Paulo
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT THROUGH VISION 2020, 2019, : 5393 - 5404
  • [7] Testing trade-off theory and pecking order theory under managerial overconfidence
    Bukalska, Elzbieta
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2019, 55 (02) : 99 - 117
  • [8] Are trade-off and pecking order theories mutually exclusive in explaining capital structure decisions?
    Serrasqueiro, Zelia
    Nunes, Paulo Macas
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 4 (11): : 2216 - 2230
  • [9] Pecking Order Theory versus Trade-Off Theory: are service SMEs’ capital structure decisions different?
    Zélia Silva Serrasqueiro
    Manuel Rocha Armada
    Paulo Maçãs Nunes
    [J]. Service Business, 2011, 5 : 381 - 409
  • [10] Pecking Order Theory versus Trade-Off Theory: are service SMEs' capital structure decisions different?
    Serrasqueiro, Zelia Silva
    Armada, Manuel Rocha
    Nunes, Paulo Macas
    [J]. SERVICE BUSINESS, 2011, 5 (04) : 381 - 409