Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence

被引:41
|
作者
Fiaschi, Davide [1 ]
Lavezzi, Andrea Mario [2 ,3 ]
Parenti, Angela [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Econ & Management, Via Cosimo Ridolfi 10, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Palermo, Departimento Giurisprudenza, Piazza Bologni 8, I-90134 Palermo, Italy
[3] CICSE, Siena, Italy
[4] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Piazza S Francesco 19, I-55100 Lucca, Italy
关键词
European regional disparities; European regional policy; spatial panel model; spatial spillovers; structural and cohesion funds; EUROPEAN STRUCTURAL FUNDS; SPATIAL EXTERNALITIES; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; REGIONAL POLICY; CONVERGENCE; IMPACT; INNOVATION; DISCONTINUITY; SPILLOVERS; UNION;
D O I
10.1111/jors.12364
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy in the regions of 12 EU countries in the period 1991-2008, on the basis of a spatial growth model, which allows for the identification of both direct and indirect effects of EU funds on GDP per worker growth. We find that Objective 1 funds are characterized by strong spatial externalities and a positive and concave effect on the growth of GDP per worker, which reaches a peak at the ratio funds/GDP of approximately 3 percent and becomes non-significant after 4 percent. Objective 2 and Cohesion funds have nonsignificant effects, while all the other funds exert a positive and significant effect, but their size is very limited. EU Cohesion Policy, moreover, appears to have increased its effectiveness over time. In the period 2000-2006 Objective 1 funds are estimated to have a median multiplier equal to 1.52, and to have added 0.37 percent to the GDP per worker growth. Overall, in the period 1991-2008, funds are estimated to have added 1.4 percent to the median annual growth, and to have reduced regional disparities of 8 basis points in terms of the Gini index.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 423
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism?
    Rodriguez-Pose, Andres
    Dijkstra, Lewis
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2021, 55 (02) : 354 - 369
  • [2] The EU Cohesion Policy in context: Does a bottom-up approach work in all regions?
    Crescenzi, Riccardo
    Giua, Mara
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2016, 48 (11): : 2340 - 2357
  • [3] EU Cohesion Policy towards territorial cohesion?
    Medeiros, Eduardo
    Potluka, Oto
    Demeterova, Barbara
    Musialkowska, Ida
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2024, 58 (08) : 1513 - 1517
  • [4] Reform of the EU Cohesion Policy
    Koenig, Petr
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2012, 20 (02) : 252 - 263
  • [5] THE COHESION POLICY AT EU LEVEL
    Tatulescu, Alina
    [J]. ROMANIAN STATISTICAL REVIEW, 2013, (08) : 38 - 43
  • [6] Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU
    Bergs, Rolf
    [J]. JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2017, 55 (04) : 948 - 949
  • [7] Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU
    Jubulis, Mark A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF REGIONAL STUDIES, 2020, 50 (01) : 142 - 145
  • [8] Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy
    Domorenok, Ekaterina
    Graziano, Paolo
    Polverari, Laura
    [J]. POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 40 (01) : 58 - 78
  • [9] Institutional Capacity for EU Cohesion Policy: Concept, Evidence and Tools that Matter
    Busetti, Simone
    Pacchi, Carolina
    [J]. DISP, 2014, 50 (04): : 16 - 28
  • [10] Citizens' perception of Cohesion Policy: from theory to empirical evidence
    Capello, Roberta
    Perucca, Giovanni
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 53 (11) : 1520 - 1530