Analysis of the spatial-temporal differences and fairness of the regional energy ecological footprint of the Silk Road Economic Belt (China Section)

被引:51
|
作者
Yang, Yi [1 ]
Fan, Mingdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Energy ecological footprint; Energy biocapacity; Gini coefficient; Economic contribution coefficient; Silk Road Economic Belt (China Section); SOCIAL-INEQUALITY; CARBON; CONSUMPTION; RESOURCES; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT; GINI; SUSTAINABILITY; METHODOLOGY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.170
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Maintaining the spatial equilibrium between the ecological environment and economic growth is the basis for the sustainable development of a region. The energy ecological footprint (EEF) is utilized to characterize the pressure of energy consumption on the ecological environment. The EEF, energy biocapacity (EBC), energy ecological pressure index (EEPI), and energy ecological footprint per 10,000 USD of gross provincial product (EEF per 10,000 USD of GPP) of the 9 provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) (China Section) from 2005 to 2015 were calculated. The EEF fairness evaluation model was constructed by using the Gini coefficient, the economic contribution coefficient (ECC), and the energy ecological support coefficient (EESC). The results show that the EEF of the 9 provinces along the SREB (China Section) is increasing and has grown faster in the northwestern provinces than the southwestern provinces. However, the EBC has hardly changed, and the difference in energy ecological pressure has gradually increased. The economic contribution and energy ecological support Gini coefficients of the SREB (China Section) ranged from [0.19, 0.25] and [0.30, 0.35], respectively, which were both lower than the "0.4 warning line", thus indicating that the EEF allocations of the provinces were relatively fair. Among these allocations, Sichuan, Yunnan and Guangxi are provinces that make a high economic contribution and a high energy ecological support contribution. Shaanxi and Chongqing are provinces that make a high economic contribution and a low energy ecological support contribution. Qinghai is a province that makes a low economic contribution and a high energy ecological support contribution. And Xinjiang, Gansu and Ningxia are provinces that make a low economic contribution and low energy ecological support contribution. To this end, appropriate development policies should be proposed for provinces with different economic contributions and energy ecological support capacities, and regional energy cooperation platforms should be established. This strategy will promote the interconnection of energy consumption, improve the fairness of regional energy ecological pressure, and realize the integration of energy and economic development. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1246 / 1261
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The spatial and temporal evolution of coordinated ecological and socioeconomic development in the provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt in China
    Yang, Yi
    Hu, Na
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2019, 47
  • [2] Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Factor Decomposition for Ecological Pressure of Carbon Footprint in the One Belt and One Road
    Sun, Qipeng
    Geng, Yafang
    Ma, Fei
    Wang, Chao
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Xiu
    Wang, Wenlin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [3] Analysis of the differences and spatial-temporal dynamic evolution of the environmental sustainability of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Lei, Zhimei
    Cai, Shanshan
    Zhuo, Shaoxin
    Lau, Yui-yip
    Lim, Ming Kim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2024, 19 (05)
  • [4] Spatial patterns and the changing law of spatial and temporal factors in the economic quality of China's Silk Road Economic Belt
    Ni, Yuchen
    Huang, Zhenna
    Hu, Jiayu
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (14)
  • [5] Regional Differences and Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics of Digital Economy Development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Chen, Jiayi
    Hu, Chaozhu
    Luo, Youxi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [6] Analysis and Forecast of Regional Freight Characteristics in the Silk Road Economic Belt
    Wang, Jianqiang
    Huang, Zhipeng
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL 2, 2017, 455 : 53 - 63
  • [7] Reconciling ecological footprint and ecosystem services in natural capital accounting: Applying a novel framework to the Silk Road Economic Belt in China
    Zhang, Ruqian
    Li, Penghui
    Xu, Liping
    Zhong, Shuai
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 330
  • [8] Quantitative analysis of natural capital utilization in the provinces along the Silk Road Economic Belt (China section)
    Guo, Shanshan
    Wang, Yinghong
    Wu, Changyue
    He, Wei
    Xiang, Lan
    2020 THIRD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENT AND GEOSCIENCE, 2020, 569
  • [9] Comparative analysis of spatial-temporal differences in sustainable development between the Yangtze River Economic Belt and the Yellow River Economic Belt
    Ji, Yongyue
    Zhang, Lijun
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (01) : 979 - 994
  • [10] Tracking the spatial-temporal distribution and regional differences of carbon footprint in grid scale of China's construction industry
    Guo, Xiaomin
    Chuai, Xiaowei
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (25) : 67187 - 67199