Breast MR imaging for cancer detection and implant evaluation potential pitfalls

被引:8
|
作者
Piccoli, CW [1 ]
Greer, JG [1 ]
Mitchell, DG [1 ]
机构
[1] THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIV HOSP,PHILADELPHIA,PA 19107
关键词
breast; prostheses; breast neoplasms; diagnosis;
D O I
10.1148/radiographics.16.1.63
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast is currently used for evaluation of both parenchymal disease and silicone gel implants. MR imaging has the potential to address questions raised or unanswered with traditional diagnostic imaging methods. However, lesion specificity and cancer sensitivity depend on multiple technical factors (ie, imaging parameters and contrast agent delivery) and biologic factors (ie, the menstrual status of the patient and the vascularity of the lesion), Although diagnostic criteria for parenchymal disease have been reported, overlap of malignant and benign enhancement profiles occurs, The accuracy of implant evaluation depends on the imaging parameters and knowledge of the implant type and surgical history, In addition, individual investigative imaging methods are diverse, causing difficulty in protocol development for the practicing radiologist. An awareness of the problematic factors in breast MR imaging will improve diagnostic accuracy and allow understanding of the limitations of the modality and individual patient examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 75
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PITFALLS IN BREAST IMPLANT MR-IMAGING
    MIDDLETON, MS
    MCNAMARA, MP
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 371 - 371
  • [2] PITFALLS IN BREAST MR-IMAGING
    MIDDLETON, MS
    MCNAMARA, MP
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 460 - 460
  • [3] Potential of Infrared Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection: A Critical Evaluation
    Owens, Alyssa
    Kandlikar, Satish G.
    Phatak, Pradyumna
    Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy, 2021, 4 (04)
  • [4] Potential and pitfalls of sentinel node detection in breast cancer
    Chu, KU
    Giuliano, AE
    LYMPHATIC METASTASIS AND SENTINEL LYMPHONODECTOMY, 2000, 157 : 237 - 249
  • [5] MR IMAGING OF BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURE
    BERG, WA
    BREM, RF
    ANDERSON, ND
    KUHLMAN, JE
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 207 - 207
  • [6] MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer
    Orel, SG
    Schnall, MD
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) : 13 - 30
  • [7] MR DETECTION OF BREAST IMPLANT RUPTURE
    BREM, RF
    TEMPANY, CMC
    ZERHOUNI, EA
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1992, 16 (01) : 157 - 159
  • [8] Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast
    Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee
    Choe, K. Ann
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 : S147 - S164
  • [9] PITFALLS IN STAGING OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN MR IMAGING
    SCOUTT, LM
    MCCARTHY, S
    LONG, F
    CHAMBERS, S
    CHAMBERS, J
    KOHORN, E
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 183 - 183
  • [10] Double Inversion Recovery MR Imaging of the Breast: Efficacy in Detection of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Jeoung Hyun
    Ryu, Jung Kyu
    Jahng, Geon-Ho
    Song, Jeong Yoon
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 39 (01) : 51 - 58