Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish

被引:289
|
作者
Martins, Catarina I. M. [1 ,2 ]
Galhardo, Leonor [3 ]
Noble, Chris [4 ]
Damsgard, Borge [4 ]
Spedicato, Maria T. [5 ]
Zupa, Walter [5 ]
Beauchaud, Marilyn [6 ]
Kulczykowska, Ewa [7 ]
Massabuau, Jean-Charles [8 ]
Carter, Toby [9 ]
Rey Planellas, Sonia [10 ]
Kristiansen, Tore [11 ]
机构
[1] Univ Algarve, Ctr Ciencias Mar do Algarve CCMAR, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal
[2] Wageningen Univ, Aquaculture & Fisheries Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Inst Super Psicol Aplicada, Unidade Invest Ecoetol, P-1149041 Lisbon, Portugal
[4] Nofima Marin, N-9291 Tromso, Norway
[5] COISPA Tecnol & Ric, I-70126 Bari, Italy
[6] Univ St Etienne, Lab Ecol & Neuroethol Sensorielles EA3988, F-42023 St Etienne 02, France
[7] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Oceanol, PL-81712 Sopot, Poland
[8] Univ Bordeaux 1, CNRS, UMR EPOC 5805, Stn Marine, F-33120 Arcachon, France
[9] Anglia Ruskin Univ, Cambridge CB1 1PT, England
[10] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[11] Inst Marine Res, N-5817 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Fish behaviour; Well-being; Aquaculture; Operational welfare indicators; Mental states; Stress; Appraisal; TROUT ONCORHYNCHUS-MYKISS; SALMON SALMO-SALAR; BASS DICENTRARCHUS-LABRAX; REPEAT SWIMMING PERFORMANCE; BRAIN SEROTONERGIC ACTIVITY; BREAM SPARUS-AURATA; JUVENILE ATLANTIC SALMON; CHAR SALVELINUS-ALPINUS; COD GADUS-MORHUA; RAINBOW-TROUT;
D O I
10.1007/s10695-011-9518-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Behaviour represents a reaction to the environment as fish perceive it and is therefore a key element of fish welfare. This review summarises the main findings on how behavioural changes have been used to assess welfare in farmed fish, using both functional and feeling-based approaches. Changes in foraging behaviour, ventilatory activity, aggression, individual and group swimming behaviour, stereotypic and abnormal behaviour have been linked with acute and chronic stressors in aquaculture and can therefore be regarded as likely indicators of poor welfare. On the contrary, measurements of exploratory behaviour, feed anticipatory activity and reward-related operant behaviour are beginning to be considered as indicators of positive emotions and welfare in fish. Despite the lack of scientific agreement about the existence of sentience in fish, the possibility that they are capable of both positive and negative emotions may contribute to the development of new strategies (e. g. environmental enrichment) to promote good welfare. Numerous studies that use behavioural indicators of welfare show that behavioural changes can be interpreted as either good or poor welfare depending on the fish species. It is therefore essential to understand the species-specific biology before drawing any conclusions in relation to welfare. In addition, different individuals within the same species may exhibit divergent coping strategies towards stressors, and what is tolerated by some individuals may be detrimental to others. Therefore, the assessment of welfare in a few individuals may not represent the average welfare of a group and vice versa. This underlines the need to develop on-farm, operational behavioural welfare indicators that can be easily used to assess not only the individual welfare but also the welfare of the whole group (e. g. spatial distribution). With the ongoing development of video technology and image processing, the on-farm surveillance of behaviour may in the near future represent a low-cost, noninvasive tool to assess the welfare of farmed fish.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 41
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioural indicators of welfare in farmed fish
    Catarina I. M. Martins
    Leonor Galhardo
    Chris Noble
    Børge Damsgård
    Maria T. Spedicato
    Walter Zupa
    Marilyn Beauchaud
    Ewa Kulczykowska
    Jean-Charles Massabuau
    Toby Carter
    Sònia Rey Planellas
    Tore Kristiansen
    [J]. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 38 : 17 - 41
  • [2] Behavioural syndromes in farmed fish: implications for production and welfare
    Huntingford, F
    Adams, C
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR, 2005, 142 : 1207 - 1221
  • [3] WELFARE OF FARMED FISH
    LYMBERY, P
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1992, 131 (01) : 19 - 20
  • [4] WELFARE OF FARMED FISH
    WALL, T
    SOUTHGATE, PJ
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1992, 130 (24) : 543 - 543
  • [5] Welfare of farmed fish at slaughter
    Southgate, P
    Wall, T
    [J]. IN PRACTICE, 2001, 23 (05) : 277 - +
  • [6] Welfare indicators for farmed Atlantic Salmon
    Carter, E.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2019, 28 (02) : 231 - 231
  • [8] Demand feeding and welfare in farmed fish
    Attia, Joel
    Millot, Sandie
    Di-Poi, Carole
    Begout, Marie-Laure
    Noble, Chris
    Javier Sanchez-Vazquez, F.
    Terova, Genciana
    Saroglia, Marco
    Damsgard, Borge
    [J]. FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 38 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [9] Anaesthesia of farmed fish: implications for welfare
    Zahl, Inger Hilde
    Samuelsen, Ole
    Kiessling, Anders
    [J]. FISH PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 38 (01) : 201 - 218
  • [10] Safeguarding the welfare of farmed fish at harvest
    J. A. Lines
    J. Spence
    [J]. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry, 2012, 38 : 153 - 162