WHAT CAN BE WRONG WITH AN OPTION? AN OPTIONAL COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW AS A REGULATORY TOOL

被引：0
|
作者：
Eidenmueller, Horst [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
来源：
COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW | 2013年 / 50卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号：
030207 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：69 / 84
页数：16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards an Optional Common European Sales Law
    Hondius, Ewoud
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW, 2011, 19 (06): : 709 - 715
  • [2] OPTIONAL LAW FOR FIRMS AND CONSUMERS: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF OPTING INTO THE COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW
    Jose Ganuza, Juan
    Gomez, Fernando
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2013, 50 : 29 - 50
  • [3] THE QUESTIONABLE BASIS OF THE COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW: THE ROLE OF AN OPTIONAL INSTRUMENT IN JURISDICTIONAL COMPETITION
    Posner, Eric A.
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2013, 50 : 261 - 275
  • [4] PUBLIC SUPPLY OF OPTIONAL STANDARDIZED CONSUMER CONTRACTS: A RATIONALE FOR THE COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW?
    Ackermann, Thomas
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2013, 50 : 11 - 27
  • [5] COSTS AND BENEFITS OF AN OPTIONAL EUROPEAN SALES LAW (CESL)
    Grundmann, Stefan
    [J]. COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2013, 50 : 225 - 242
  • [6] European Perspectives on the Common European Sales Law
    Ene, Charlotte
    [J]. JURIDICAL TRIBUNE-TRIBUNA JURIDICA, 2016, 6 (01): : 197 - 200
  • [7] The Optional Common European Sales Law: Better Buyer's Remedies for Seller's Non-performance in Sales of Goods?
    Feltkamp, Regine
    Vanbossele, Frederic
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW, 2011, 19 (06): : 873 - 905
  • [8] OPTING FOR THE COMMON EUROPEAN SALES LAW
    Fernandez Masia, Enrique
    [J]. REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES, 2012, (23):
  • [9] The Common European Sales Law in Context
    Mak, Vanessa
    [J]. EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2016, 41 (02) : 296 - 298
  • [10] Common European Sales Law (CESL) - Commentary
    De Graaff, Ruben
    Rampersad, Yvo
    De Tavernier, Pieter
    Van Der Weide, Jeroen
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF PRIVATE LAW, 2013, 21 (04): : 1145 - 1155
12345