Sex differences in jealousy: a meta-analytic examination

被引:74
|
作者
Sagarin, Brad J. [1 ]
Martin, Amy L. [1 ]
Coutinho, Savia A. [1 ]
Edlund, John E. [2 ]
Patel, Lily [1 ]
Skowronski, John J. [1 ]
Zengel, Bettina [1 ]
机构
[1] No Illinois Univ, Dept Psychol, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
[2] Rochester Inst Technol, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Jealousy; Evolution; Sex differences; Meta-analysis; EMOTIONAL RESPONSES; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES; EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY; IMAGINED INFIDELITY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SELF; EXPERIENCES; DISTRESS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.02.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The theory of evolved sex differences in jealousy predicts sex differences in responses to sexual infidelities and emotional infidelities. Critics have argued that such differences are absent in studies that use continuous measures to assess responses to hypothetical infidelities or in studies that assess responses to real infidelities. These criticisms were tested in two random-effects meta-analyses of 40 published and unpublished papers (providing 209 effect sizes from 47 independent samples) that measured sex differences in jealousy using continuous measures. A significant, theory-supportive sex difference emerged across 45 independent samples using continuous measures of responses to hypothetical infidelities, g*=0.258, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.188, 0.328], p<.00001. Measured emotion significantly moderated effect size. Effects were strongest when measures assessed distress/upset (g*=0.337) and jealousy (g*=0.309). Other commonly measured negative emotions yielded weaker effects, including hurt (g*=0.161), anger (g*=0.074), and disgust (g*=0.012). Across the 45 independent samples, six significant moderators emerged: random sampling, population type (student vs. nonstudent samples), age, inclusion of a forced-choice question, number of points in the response scale, and year of publication. A significant, theory-supportive effect also emerged across seven studies assessing reactions to actual infidelities, g*=0.234, 95% CI [0.020, 0.448], p=.03. Results demonstrate that the sex difference in jealousy neither is an artifact of response format nor is limited to responses to hypothetical infidelities. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 614
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping
    Tamres, LK
    Janicki, D
    Helgeson, VS
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2002, 6 (01) : 2 - 30
  • [2] Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review
    Richard A. Block
    Peter A. Hancock
    Dan Zakay
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28 : 1333 - 1346
  • [3] Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review
    Block, RA
    Hancock, PA
    Zakay, D
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (08) : 1333 - 1346
  • [4] A Meta-Analytic Examination of Hardiness
    Eschleman, Kevin J.
    Bowling, Nathan A.
    Alarcon, Gene M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 17 (04) : 277 - 307
  • [5] Sex Differences in Cooperation: A Meta-Analytic Review of Social Dilemmas
    Balliet, Daniel
    Li, Norman P.
    Macfarlan, Shane J.
    Van Vugt, Mark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2011, 137 (06) : 881 - 909
  • [6] SEX-DIFFERENCES IN OCCUPATIONAL STRESS - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW
    MARTOCCHIO, JJ
    OLEARY, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (03) : 495 - 501
  • [7] Sex Drive: Theoretical Conceptualization and Meta-Analytic Review of Gender Differences
    Frankenbach, Julius
    Weber, Marcel
    Loschelder, David D.
    Kilger, Helena
    Friese, Malte
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2022, 148 (9-10) : 621 - 661
  • [9] META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF SEX-DIFFERENCES IN GROUP-PERFORMANCE
    WOOD, W
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 102 (01) : 53 - 71