Anovaginal distance and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective observational study

Introduction and HypothesisNo measurements are available for diagnosing the extent of obstetric lacerations. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between the anovaginal distance (AVD) measured with transperineal ultrasound immediately after delivery and external anal sphincter injury. A secondary aim was to assess whether the palpated perineal thickness was associated with the AVD.MethodsA prospective observational study of 150 primiparous women at the University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweden. After vaginal delivery, initial inspection and palpation of the perineal thickness were performed by the midwife. The women were then divided into subgroups depending on the degree of the suspected perineal laceration. Transperineal ultrasound of the AVD was performed by a physician. Diagnostics of the perineal laceration were done according to standard care.ResultsWomen with an external sphincter injury had a shorter AVD and shorter palpatory perineal thickness compared with women without anal sphincter injury. No external sphincter injuries were diagnosed when the AVD and/or palpation height was > 20mm. The mean AVD in the group with probable second-degree laceration (n=85) was 18.8mm (95% CI 17.8-19.8), in suspected third-degree laceration (n=33) 15.7mm (95% CI 13.7-17.7) and in probable third-degree laceration (n=32) 11.8mm (95% CI 9.7-13.9) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsA short AVD could be a warning sign postpartum and should increase the awareness of possible external sphincter injury before suturing. An AVD of 20mm seems to indicate a cutoff level of the occurrence of external sphincter injury, but this needs further evaluation.