Conditioning intensity-dependent interaction between short-latency interhemispheric inhibition and short-latency afferent inhibition

被引:11
|
作者
Tsutsumi, Ryosuke [1 ]
Shirota, Yuichiro
Ohminami, Shinya
Terao, Yasuo
Ugawa, Yoshikazu [2 ]
Hanajima, Ritsuko
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch Med, Dept Neurol,Div Neurosci, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138655, Japan
[2] Fukushima Med Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Fukushima, Japan
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; primary motor cortex; transcallosal inhibition; motor evoked potential; interneuron; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY INPUT; CIRCUITS; TMS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00300.2012
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Tsutsumi R, Shirota Y, Ohminami S, Terao Y, Ugawa Y, Hanajima R. Conditioning intensity-dependent interaction between short-latency interhemispheric inhibition and short-latency afferent inhibition. J Neurophysiol 108: 1130-1137, 2012. First published May 23, 2012; doi:10.1152/jn.00300.2012.-The relationship between sensory and transcallosal inputs into the motor cortex may be important in motor performance, but it has not been well studied, especially in humans. The aim of this study was to reveal this relationship by investigating the interaction between short-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI) and short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) in humans with transcranial magnetic stimulation. SIHI is the inhibition of the primary motor cortex (M1) elicited by contralateral M1 stimulation given similar to 10 ms before, and it reflects transcallosal inhibition. SAI is the inhibition of M1 elicited by contralateral median nerve stimulation preceding M1 stimulation by similar to 20 ms. In this investigation, we studied the intensity dependence of SIHI and SAI and the interaction between SIHI and SAI in various conditioning intensities. Subjects were 11 normal volunteers. The degree of effects was evaluated by comparing motor evoked potential sizes recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle between a certain condition and control condition. Both SIHI and SAI were potentiated by increment of the conditioning stimulus intensity and saturated at 1.4 times resting motor threshold for SIHI and 3 times sensory threshold for SAI. No significant interaction was observed when either of their intensities was subthreshold for the inhibition on its own. Only when both intensities were strong enough for their inhibition did the presence of one inhibition lessen the other one. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that interneurons mediating SIHI and SAI have mutual, direct, and inhibitory interaction in a conditioning intensity-dependent manner.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conditioning intensity dependent interaction between interhemispheric inhibition and short-latency afferent inhibition
    Tsutsumi, R.
    Hanajima, R.
    Shirota, Y.
    Ohminami, S.
    Terao, Y.
    Ugawa, Y.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2012, 27 : S86 - S87
  • [2] On the effects of aging on short-latency afferent inhibition
    Tremblay, Francois
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (08) : 2720 - 2720
  • [3] Short-latency afferent inhibition determined by the sensory afferent volley
    Bailey, Aaron Z.
    Asmussen, Michael J.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 116 (02) : 637 - 644
  • [4] Effects of short-latency afferent inhibition on short-interval intracortical inhibition
    Udupa, Kaviraja
    Ni, Zhen
    Gunraj, Carolyn
    Chen, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 111 (06) : 1350 - 1361
  • [5] Short-Latency Afferent Inhibition Modulation during Finger Movement
    Asmussen, Michael J.
    Jacobs, Mark F.
    Lee, Kevin G. H.
    Zapallow, Christopher M.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [6] SHORT-LATENCY AFFERENT INHIBITION IN CHRONIC SPINAL CORD INJURY
    Bailey, Aaron Z.
    Mi, Yiqun P.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 6 (01) : 235 - 243
  • [7] Dissociated effects of diazepam and lorazepam on short-latency afferent inhibition
    Di Lazzaro, V
    Pilato, F
    Dileone, M
    Tonali, PA
    Ziemann, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 569 (01): : 315 - 323
  • [8] Short-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement
    Bernhard Voller
    Alan St Clair Gibson
    James Dambrosia
    Sarah Pirio Richardson
    Mikhail Lomarev
    Nguyet Dang
    Mark Hallett
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2006, 169 : 226 - 231
  • [9] Short-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement
    Voller, B
    Gibson, AS
    Dambrosia, J
    Richardson, SP
    Lomarev, M
    Dang, N
    Hallett, M
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 169 (02) : 226 - 231
  • [10] Experimental environment improves the reliability of short-latency afferent inhibition
    Ramdeo, Karishma R.
    Rehsi, Ravjot S.
    Foglia, Stevie D.
    Turco, Claudia V.
    Toepp, Stephen L.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):