Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Odawara, Masato [1 ]
Yoshiki, Mika [2 ]
Sano, Misako [2 ]
Hamada, Izumi [2 ]
Lukashevich, Valentina [3 ]
Kothny, Wolfgang [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med Univ, Dept Diabet Endocrinol Metab & Rheumatol, Tokyo 1608402, Japan
[2] Novartis Pharma KK, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Nova Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ USA
[4] Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; Metformin; Single-pill combination; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Vildagliptin;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-015-0099-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in combination with metformin is increasing in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but no single-pill combination (SPC) is currently available in Japan. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin/metformin SPC in Japanese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with vildagliptin monotherapy. Methods: This was a 14-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. 171 patients with T2DM inadequately controlled [HbA1c (glycosylated hemoglobin) 7.0-10.0%] with vildagliptin 50 mg twice daily (bid) were randomized (2: 1) to receive either a vildagliptin/metformin SPC (n = 115) or matching vildagliptin/placebo SPC (n = 56). Results: Baseline demographics and background characteristics were generally comparable between the treatment groups. The change in HbA1c [mean +/- standard error (SE)] was -0.8 +/- 0.1% in the vildagliptin/metformin SPC (baseline HbA1c, 7.9 +/- 0.1%) group and 0.1 +/- 0.1% in the vildagliptin/placebo SPC (baseline HbA1c, 8.0 +/- 0.1%) group, with a between-treatment difference of -1.0 +/- 0.1% (P<0.001) in favor of the vildagliptin/metformin SPC group. The proportion of patients achieving target HbA1c <7.0% was significantly higher with vildagliptin/metformin SPC compared with vildagliptin/placebo SPC (45.8% vs. 13.5%, P<0.001). The overall incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 43.5% in the vildagliptin/metformin SPC and 67.9% in the vildagliptin/placebo SPC group. The incidences of serious AEs were low in both the treatment groups (0.9% vs. 3.6%, respectively). Body weight remained constant throughout the study in both the treatment groups. There were no deaths or hypoglycemic events during the study. Conclusions: Switching Japanese patients with T2DM requiring treatment intensification, from vildagliptin monotherapy to a vildagliptin/metformin SPC (50/250 or 50/500 mg) was efficacious and safe, eliciting significant reduction in HbA1c without increased risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of a Single-Pill Combination of Vildagliptin and Metformin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Masato Odawara
    Mika Yoshiki
    Misako Sano
    Izumi Hamada
    Valentina Lukashevich
    Wolfgang Kothny
    Diabetes Therapy, 2015, 6 : 17 - 27
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in combination with insulin: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Nobuya Inagaki
    Shin-ichi Harashima
    Nobuko Maruyama
    Yutaka Kawaguchi
    Maki Goda
    Hiroaki Iijima
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 15
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in combination with insulin: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Inagaki, Nobuya
    Harashima, Shin-ichi
    Maruyama, Nobuko
    Kawaguchi, Yutaka
    Goda, Maki
    Iijima, Hiroaki
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2016, 15
  • [4] Metformin in gestational diabetes mellitus: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial
    Tew, Min P.
    Tan, Peng C.
    Saaid, Rahmah
    Hong, Jesrine G. S.
    Omar, Siti Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (03) : 508 - 515
  • [5] Combination Treatment With Ipragliflozin and Metformin: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Veltkamp, Stephan A.
    van Dijk, Jan
    Collins, Christiane
    van Bruijnsvoort, Michel
    Kadokura, Takeshi
    Smulders, Ronald A.
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (08) : 1761 - 1771
  • [6] A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial on the antihypertensive treatment effect of a quadruple single-pill combination
    Hu, Lei-Xiao
    Wang, Dian
    Liu, Hua-Ling
    Zhang, Qing-Tao
    Sun, Dong-Sheng
    Zhang, Li
    Chen, Xin
    Chang, Gui-Li
    Wang, Ji-Guang
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 23 (04): : 815 - 822
  • [7] The efficacy and safety of Ginkgo biloba extract as an adjuvant in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients ineffectively managed with metformin: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Aziz, Tavga Ahmed
    Hussain, Saad Abdulrahman
    Mahwi, Taha Othman
    Ahmed, Zheen Aorahman
    Rahman, Heshu Sulaiman
    Rasedee, Abdullah
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2018, 12 : 735 - 742
  • [8] Ipragliflozin in combination with metformin for the treatment of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: ILLUMINATE, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Kashiwagi, A.
    Kazuta, K.
    Goto, K.
    Yoshida, S.
    Ueyama, E.
    Utsuno, A.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2015, 17 (03): : 304 - 308
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin as add-on to insulin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Sone, Hirohito
    Kaneko, Tatsuroh
    Shiki, Kosuke
    Tachibana, Yoshifumi
    Pfarr, Egon
    Lee, Jisoo
    Tajima, Naoko
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2020, 22 (03): : 417 - 426
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin as monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study
    Seino, Yutaka
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Fukatsu, Atsushi
    Ubukata, Michito
    Sakai, Soichi
    Samukawa, Yoshishige
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (07) : 1245 - 1255