Diagnosing melanoma: how do we assess how good we are?

被引:21
|
作者
Esdaile, B. [1 ]
Mahmud, I. [1 ]
Palmer, A. [1 ]
Bowling, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Churchill Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
关键词
PIGMENTED SKIN-LESIONS; PRIMARY-CARE; NUMBER; DERMOSCOPY; CANCER; AUSTRALIA; ACCURACY; TREAT;
D O I
10.1111/ced.12223
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundEvaluating and improving diagnostic accuracy in identification of melanomas is important for both conservation of healthcare resources and reduction in patient morbidity. Useful indicators in assessing this accuracy include the number needed to treat (NNT) and the benign:malignant (B:M) ratio. Both of these methods lack sensitivity, as they do not account for the ability to detect early or in situ melanomas. AimTo assess the NNT and B:M ratio for a busy hospital serving a population of 650000 over a 5-year period, and to assess a new ratio of diagnostic accuracy by calculating the ratio of invasive (malignant) melanomas to melanoma in situ (MM:MMIS) as a marker of sensitivity. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of data on all melanocytic lesions excised during two separate years (2006 and 2011) with a 5-year interval between them. The lesions were divided into benign naevi (BN), dysplastic naevi (DN), MMIS and MM. ResultsIn 2006, 650 melanocytic lesions were excised (462 BN/DN, 45 MMIS, 143 MM). The NNT was 3.46, the B:M ratio was 2.46 and the MM:MMIS ratio was 3.18. In 2011, 730 melanocytic lesions were excised (464 BN/DN, 99 MMIS, 167 MM). The NNT was 2.74, the B:M ratio was 1.74 and the MM:MMIS ratio was 1.69. ConclusionsThe NNT and B:M ratios from our study compare favourably with those in the published literature. The fall in the MM:MMIS and B:M ratios over this 5-year study appears to be an indicator of the ability to detect early disease and is probably secondary to the changes to our skin cancer service. This study may encourage physicians to aim not only for low B:M ratios but also low MM:MMIS ratios.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How good are we at diagnosing seizures based on semiology?
    Seneviratne, Udaya
    Rajendran, Deepa
    Brusco, Maria
    Phan, Thanh G.
    [J]. EPILEPSIA, 2012, 53 (04) : e63 - e66
  • [2] How good are we at diagnosing polycystic ovary syndrome?
    Franks, Stephen
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 67 (06) : 809 - 810
  • [3] How do we assess microsurgical skill?
    Kalu, PU
    Atkins, J
    Baker, D
    Green, CJ
    Butler, PEM
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 2005, 25 (01) : 25 - 29
  • [4] How do we assess crop loss?
    Esker, P.
    Bradley, C.
    Paul, P.
    Robertson, A.
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S223 - S223
  • [5] How do we recognise good research?
    Salmon, P
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2003, 16 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [6] How do we assess how happy we are? Tenets, implications and tenability of three theories
    Veenhoven, Ruut
    [J]. HAPPINESS, ECONOMICS AND POLITICS: TOWARDS A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2009, : 45 - 69
  • [7] How Do We Sound? How Do We Listen?
    Tucker, Sherrie
    [J]. WOMEN AND MUSIC-A JOURNAL OF GENDER AND CULTURE, 2023, 27
  • [8] How good are we?
    Hancock, WS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2003, 2 (02) : 121 - 121
  • [9] Metacognition in psychosis: What and how do we assess it?
    Diaz-Cutraro, Luciana
    Garcia-Mieres, Helena
    Dimaggio, Giancarlo
    Lysaker, Paul
    Moritz, Steffen
    Ochoa, Susana
    [J]. SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 16 (03): : 206 - 207
  • [10] How Do We Assess the Impact of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology?
    Weiss, Paul S.
    [J]. ACS NANO, 2021, 15 (01) : 1 - 2