Survey to assess the role of pharmacy technicians and nonpharmacist staff in the operation of research pharmacies

Purpose. Results of a survey assessing trends and innovations in the use of pharmacy technicians and other nonpharmacist staff in the research pharmacy setting are reported. Methods. A Web-based survey was distributed to Internet communities of members of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists and the University Health System Consortium involved in investigational drug research and related practice area's. The survey collected data on the characteristics of institutions with pharmacy department staff dedicated to such research activities and the participation of pharmacists, technicians, and other staff in key areas of research pharmacy operations. Results. Survey responses from 51 institutions were included in the data analysis. Overall, the reported distribution of assigned responsibility for most evaluated research pharmacy tasks reflected traditional divisions of pharmacist and technician duties, with technicians performing tasks sub ject to a pharmacist check or pharmacists completing tasks alone. However, some institutions reported allowing technicians to perform a number of key tasks without direct pharmacist supervision, primarily in the areas of inventory management and sponsor monitoring and auditing; almost half of the surveyed institutions reported technician involvement in teaching activities. In general, the reported use of "techcheck-tech"arrangements in research pharmacies was very limited. Some respdnding institutions reported the innovative use of nonpharmacist staff (e.g., paid interns, students and residents on rotation). Conclusion. Although the majority of research pharmacy tasks related to direct patient care are performed by or under the direct supervision of pharmacists, a variety of other essential tasks are typically assigned to pharmacy technicians and other nonpharmacist staff.