An alternative approach for sustainable sheep meat production: implications for food security

被引:8
|
作者
Ponnampalam, Eric N. [1 ]
Knight, Matthew, I [2 ]
Moate, Peter J. [3 ,4 ]
Jacobs, Joe L. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Victoria Res, Dept Jobs Precincts & Reg, Anim Prod Sci, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[2] Agr Victoria Res, Dept Jobs Precincts & Reg, Anim Prod Sci, Hamilton, Vic 3300, Australia
[3] Agr Victoria Res, Anim Prod Sci, Dept Jobs Precincts & Reg, Ellinbank, Vic 3821, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Sch Agr & Food, Ctr Agr Innovat, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Animal welfare; Environmental sustainability; Global demand; Livestock; Sheep meat; Summer feeding; CARCASS COMPOSITION; GENOTYPE; SYSTEMS; LAMB; GROWTH; DIET;
D O I
10.1186/s40104-020-00472-z
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background A pelleted diet containing camelina hay (CAMH) or camelina meal (CAMM) as a supplement along with a control pellet (CONT) diet formulated with commonly available feeds during summer was used to investigate an alternative pathway for sustainable meat production. Sustainable meat production was based on a simple estimation of income from meat produced versus feed costs if animals were fed for an extended period over summer compared to early slaughter at the beginning of summer. Eighty maternal composite wether lambs (Composite) based on Coopworth genetics and 80 pure Merino wether yearlings were divided into 10 groups within breed (n = 8) using stratified randomisation based on liveweights. Following 1 week of adaptation to experimental diets, animals were fed experimental diets for up to10 weeks. Results Animals were slaughtered after either 8, 9 or 10 weeks of full feeding when the average liveweight of diet/genetic combination reached a weight appropriate for either 'heavy lamb' or 'heavy hogget' production, which occurred between 8 and 10 weeks of full feeding. There was no diet x breed interactions except for dressing percentage (DP), where Composite lambs fed the CAMH diet had the greatest DP (48.1 +/- 0.35) and the Merino yearlings fed the CAMM diet the lowest DP (45.8 +/- 0.33). Composite lambs gained 17.6-20.3 kg and Merino yearlings gained 10.7-12.9 kg liveweight. Based on their DP, this resulted in the production of approximately 8.3-9.5 kg additional carcass weight in Composites and 4.9-5.7 kg in Merinos, which in turn produced greater profit per Composite lamb and a small profit per Merino yearling. Conclusions Composite lambs fed CAMM and CAMH had 5% greater carcass weights at slaughter compared to the CONT group, but dietary treatments did not change carcass weight of Merino yearlings at slaughter. The extended feeding approach offered the producer an estimated economic gain of AUD $20.00 to $25.00 when yearly average prices were used (Method 1) and AUD $40.00 to $47.70 when pre- and post-summer average prices were used (Method 2) per Composite lambs, but extra carcass gain did not result in the same profit per Merino yearling. Among the Composites, the profit for animals fed the CAMH and CAMM were AUD $2.75 to $4.50 greater than CONT group when full year average prices were applied while AUD $3.50 to $5.50 greater than CONT group when pre- and post-summer average prices were applied. However, we acknowledge a combination approach of extended feeding for a portion of animals already on ground and selling the remaining animals pre-summer with joining of additional ewes is the most likely strategy. Considering the scenario of extended feeding for 3 weeks, based on the growth rates observed for Composite lambs, if an additional 2 kg carcass weight per animal can be gained for 50% of the 22 million lambs slaughtered in Australia (= 11 million animals), it would potentially supply an additional 22 million kg of lamb carcasses produced per annum. This is equivalent to producing an extra 1 million lamb carcasses per annum weighing 22 kg each. Feeding Composite lambs for an extended period and selling Merino yearlings pre-summer may be a good option due to faster growth rate of Composites that may help quick turn-over to market.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An alternative approach for sustainable sheep meat production: implications for food security
    Eric N.Ponnampalam
    Matthew I.Knight
    Peter J.Moate
    Joe L.Jacobs
    [J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2021, 12 (02) : 791 - 805
  • [2] An alternative approach for sustainable sheep meat production: implications for food security
    Eric N. Ponnampalam
    Matthew I. Knight
    Peter J. Moate
    Joe L. Jacobs
    [J]. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 11
  • [3] An approach to sustainable food security
    Kumar, S
    [J]. CURRENT SCIENCE, 2002, 83 (04): : 354 - 355
  • [4] Crop production and sustainable food security
    Swaminathan, MS
    [J]. CROP PRODUCTIVITY AND SUSTAINABILITY: SHAPING THE FUTURE, 1998, : 3 - 18
  • [5] Food security: sustainable food production in SubSaharan Africa
    Amalu, UC
    [J]. OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2002, 31 (03) : 177 - 185
  • [6] Sustainable agriculture - Increasing food production and food security
    Pretty, JN
    [J]. APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 23 (02) : 9 - 11
  • [7] Implications of Food Culture and Practice on the Acceptance of Alternative Meat
    Fujiwara, Natsumi
    Tachikawa, Masashi
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [8] One Health for Food Safety, Food Security, and Sustainable Food Production
    Garcia, Sara N.
    Osburn, Bennie I.
    Jay-Russell, Michele T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4
  • [9] Feedomics: Promises for food security with sustainable food animal production
    Sun, Hui-Zeng
    Guan, Le Luo
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 107 : 130 - 141
  • [10] Food production & availability - Essential prerequisites for sustainable food security
    Swaminathan, M. S.
    Bhavani, R. V.
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 138 : 383 - 391