Clinical Outcome of a Simplified Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement with Stentless Bioprostheses

被引:0
|
作者
Di Matteo, Gerardo [1 ]
Masala, Nicola [1 ]
Swanevelder, Justiaan [2 ]
Davies, Joan [3 ]
Galinanes, Manuel [1 ]
Sosnowski, Andrzej W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Cardiac Surg & Cardiovasc Sci, Coronary Care Unit, Glenfield Hosp,Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leicester, Dept Anaesthesia, Coronary Care Unit, Glenfield Hosp,Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
[3] Univ Leicester, Dept Cardiol, Coronary Care Unit, Glenfield Hosp,Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leics, England
来源
JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE | 2009年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
FOLLOW-UP; SUTURE LINE; EXPERIENCE; IMPLANTATION; XENOGRAFTS; PROSTHESIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and aim of the study: Aortic stentless bio-prostheses provide good clinical and hemodynamic results, but may be difficult to implant. Their use is also contraindicated in the presence of a severely calcified aortic root. The study aim was to assess the mid-term results of a simplified implant technique of the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis (SPF), that allows its use in the presence of severe aortic root calcification. Methods: Between 2001 and 2007, a total of 51 patients underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the SPF, using a new technique which consisted of standard annular fixation and the fixation of each strut with a single 'U' stitch. The perioperative characteristics, early and late mortality and occurrence of valve-related events were evaluated. The overall mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 91.5 +/- 30.2 and 125.3 +/- 44.9 min, respectively, and 77.8 +/- 17.7 and 105.6 +/- 22.8 min, respectively, for AVR (these times were comparable to those required in patients receiving stented valve bioprostheses). The mean follow up period was 40.5 months (range: 3-75 months), and was 100% complete. Results: Hospital mortality was 4% and survival 76.5 +/- 14.5% at six years. Late deaths occurred in eight patients; in four cases this was valve-related (1.9%/patient-year). Freedom from valve-related death and reoperation was 91 +/- 9% and 98 +/- 2% respectively, at six years. The mean transprosthetic gradients were 12.0 +/- 3.4, 9.9 +/- 2.6, 8.7 +/- 4.2, 5.2 +/- 3.9, 4.5 +/- 3.0 and 3.2 +/- 2.7 mmHg for the 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 and 29 mm valve sizes, respectively. No valvular or paravalvular regurgitation was recorded. Conclusion: This new implantation technique for the aortic SPF stentless bioprosthesis is simple, effective and versatile, and showed good early results. It may be applicable to other stentless bioprostheses, and also be particularly useful in patients with small aortic annulus and in those with a calcified aortic root.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 118
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses
    David, TE
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 1998, 13 (05) : 344 - 351
  • [2] Predicted patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with medtronic stentless freestyle bioprostheses
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    Puvimanasinghe, John P. A.
    Takkenberg, Johanna J. M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2007, 16 (04): : 423 - 428
  • [3] Randomized trial of stentless versus stented bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement
    Halstead, JC
    Tsui, SS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (04): : 1338 - 1339
  • [4] Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Low Ejection Fraction
    Ennker, Juergen
    Hangleiter, Lena
    Niemann, Bernd
    Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Boening, Andreas
    CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 134 (02) : 229 - 230
  • [5] Thrombocytopaenia after aortic valve replacement with stented, stentless and sutureless bioprostheses
    Stanger, Olaf
    Grabherr, Michael
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Longnus, Sarah
    Meinitzer, Andreas
    Fiedler, Martin
    Tevaearai, Hendrik
    Carrel, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 340 - 346
  • [6] Outcome of Aortic Valve Replacement with Bioprostheses in the Elderly
    Suojaranta-Ylinen, Raili T.
    Soisalon-Soininen, Sari
    Kaartinen, Maija
    Maasilta, Paula K.
    Vainikka, Tiina L.
    Vento, Antti E.
    Salminen, Ulla-Stina
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2009, 18 (05): : 514 - 523
  • [7] Predicted patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with medtronic stentless freestyle bioprostheses - Meeting discussion
    Bolling, Steven F.
    Kappetein, Pieter
    Modry, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2007, 16 (04): : 429 - 429
  • [8] Midterm outcome after aortic root replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Albert, Alexander
    Dalladaku, Fatmir
    Rosendahl, Ulrich
    Ennker, Juergen
    Florath, Ines
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 40 (02) : 429 - 434
  • [9] Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians: The Influence of Coronary Artery Disease
    Ennker, Juergen
    Zadeh, Behnam
    Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern
    Niemann, Bernd
    Grieshaber, Philippe
    Ennker, Ina C.
    Boening, Andreas
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2018, 66 (04): : 322 - 327
  • [10] Structural Valve Deterioration After Aortic Valve Replacement with Medtronic Freestyle Stentless Porcine Aortic Root Bioprostheses
    Nishida, Hidefumi
    Komiya, Tatsuhiko
    Sakaguchi, Genichi
    Shimamoto, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2014, 29 (01) : 22 - 25