Pregabalin for generalized anxiety disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:44
|
作者
Generoso, Marcelo B. [1 ]
Trevizol, Alisson P. [1 ]
Kasper, Siegfried [2 ]
Cho, Hyong J. [3 ]
Cordeiro, Quirino [1 ]
Shiozawa, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Casa Sch Med Sci, Dept Psychiat, Clin Neuromodulat Lab, Rua Dr Cesario Mota Junior 61, BR-01221020 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
generalized anxiety disorder; meta-analysis; pregabalin; systematic review; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENT; EFFICACY; MULTICENTER; GUIDELINES; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1097/YIC.0000000000000147
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), characterized by pervasive and highly distressing anxiety and worries, is associated with severe impairment. Although numerous agents from various drug classes are available to treat GAD, as many as 50% of patients have inadequate response, constituting an important medical frontier. In the face of this challenge, new pharmacological alternatives need to be further studied aiming at clinical improvement and better quality of life for patients. To assess the efficacy of pregabalin (PGB) compared with placebo for amelioration of anxiety symptoms in patients with GAD. A systematic literature search was performed using databases such as MEDLINE and EMBASE and other sources. The main outcome was Hedges' g for continuous scores. We used a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated with the I-2 (moderate heterogeneity was assumed if I-2 was >50% and high heterogeneity if I-2 was > 75%) and the chi(2)-test (P<0.10 for heterogeneity). Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot. Meta-regression was performed using the random-effects model. For safety evaluation, we compared patients' dropout rates. We included eight randomized-controlled trials (n=2299) in our study, comparing the use of PGB in different dosages and placebo. In terms of the main outcome, PGB was found to be superior to the placebo group (Hedges' g=0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.44). The funnel plot assessment showed a low risk of publication bias. Between-study heterogeneity was not significant (I-2=0%), strengthening our results. Meta-regression showed no particular influence of any variable on the results. A categorical analysis of safety, using dropout as the most severe possible outcome, was carried out. No difference between PGB and placebo groups was observed in terms of the dropout rates. PGB was superior to placebo for the amelioration of GAD symptoms. In addition, the dropout rate was not significantly higher than that of the placebo groups. PGB was comparable to benzodiazepines in clinical response, but had lower dropout rates than benzodiazepine. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder
    Boschen, Mark J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2011, 56 (09): : 558 - 566
  • [2] The effectiveness of Internet-delivered treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eilert, Nora
    Enrique, Angel
    Wogan, Rebecca
    Mooney, Olwyn
    Timulak, Ladislav
    Richards, Derek
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2021, 38 (02) : 196 - 219
  • [3] EFFICACY OF DULOXETINE FOR GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Puli, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 24 : A70 - A70
  • [4] Gabapentin and pregabalin in bipolar disorder, anxiety states, and insomnia: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and rationale
    James S. W. Hong
    Lauren Z. Atkinson
    Noura Al-Juffali
    Amine Awad
    John R. Geddes
    Elizabeth M. Tunbridge
    Paul J. Harrison
    Andrea Cipriani
    [J]. Molecular Psychiatry, 2022, 27 : 1339 - 1349
  • [5] Gabapentin and pregabalin in bipolar disorder, anxiety states, and insomnia: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and rationale
    Hong, James S. W.
    Atkinson, Lauren Z.
    Al-Juffali, Noura
    Awad, Amine
    Geddes, John R.
    Tunbridge, Elizabeth M.
    Harrison, Paul J.
    Cipriani, Andrea
    [J]. MOLECULAR PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 27 (03) : 1339 - 1349
  • [6] Interventions for generalized anxiety disorder in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goncalves, Daniela C.
    Byrne, Gerard J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2012, 26 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [7] Vortioxetine, a multimodal antidepressant for generalized anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pae, Chi-Un
    Wang, Sheng-Min
    Han, Changsu
    Lee, Soo-Jung
    Patkar, Ashwin A.
    Masand, Praksh S.
    Serretti, Alessandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 64 : 88 - 98
  • [8] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER
    Baldwin, D. S.
    Woods, R.
    Lawson, R.
    Taylor, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 24 : A71 - A71
  • [9] Treating Generalized Anxiety Disorder With Second Generation Antipsychotics A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lalonde, Carlos D.
    Van Lieshout, Ryan J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2011, 31 (03) : 326 - 333
  • [10] Dropout Rates in Psychological Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gersh, Elon
    [J]. EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 12 : 210 - 210