Prediction of methane adsorption in shale: Classical models and machine learning based models

被引:64
|
作者
Meng, Meng [1 ]
Zhong, Ruizhi [2 ]
Wei, Zhili [3 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Earth & Environm Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM USA
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Chem Engn, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Houston, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Shale gas; Adsorption model; Classical model; Machine learning; XGBoost; SUPERCRITICAL METHANE; HIGH-PRESSURE; RESERVOIRS; EQUATION; COAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118358
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Shale gas contributes significantly to current global energy consumption, and an accurate estimation of geological gas-in-place (GIP) determines an optimal production plan. As the dominant form of storage, adsorbed gas in shale formation is of primary importance to be assessed. This paper summarizes adsorption models into traditional pressure/density dependent isothermal models, pressure and temperature unified model, and machine learning based models. Using a comprehensive experimental dataset, these models are applied to simulate shale gas adsorption under in-situ conditions. Results show that the modified Dubinin-Radushkevich (DR) model provides the optimal performance in traditional isothermal models. Pressure and temperature unified models make a breakthrough in isothermal conditions and can extrapolate the predictions beyond test ranges of temperature. Well-trained machine learning models not only break the limit of the isothermal condition and types of shale formation, but can also provide reasonable extrapolations beyond test ranges of temperature, total organic carbon (TOC), and moisture. Four popular machine learning algorithms are used, which include artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The XGBoost model is found to provide the best results for predicting shale gas adsorption, and it can be conveniently updated for broader applications with more available data. Overall, this paper demonstrates the capability of machine learning for prediction of shale gas adsorption, and the well-trained model can potentially be built into a large numerical frame to optimize production curves of shale gas.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of shale gas production prediction models based on machine learning using early data
    Niu, Wente
    Lu, Jialiang
    Sun, Yuping
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 1229 - 1237
  • [2] Prediction of methane emission from landfills using machine learning models
    Mehrdad, Seyed Mostafa
    Abbasi, Maryam
    Yeganeh, Bijan
    Kamalan, Hamidreza
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 40 (04)
  • [3] Fast prediction of methane adsorption in shale nanopores using kinetic theory and machine learning algorithm
    Huang, MengCheng
    Xu, HengYu
    Yu, Hao
    Zhang, HouLin
    Micheal, Marembo
    Yuan, XinHeng
    Wu, HengAn
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 446
  • [4] Prediction of "bad postures" based on Machine Learning models
    Gomez Mendoza, Luis Fernando
    Huainan Vizconde, Sofia
    Castillo Sequera, Jose Luis
    Rosales Huamani, Jimmy Aurelio
    [J]. 2022 8TH INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING, SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, IESTEC, 2022, : 208 - 214
  • [5] Machine learning based models for Cardiovascular risk prediction
    Rajliwall, Nitten S.
    Davey, Rachel
    Chetty, Girija
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND DATA ENGINEERING (ICMLDE 2018), 2018, : 142 - 148
  • [6] Machine learning-based prediction models in neurosurgery
    Habashy, Karl J.
    Arrieta, Victor A.
    Feghali, James
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2023, 55 (03)
  • [7] Wind Power Prediction Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Tarek, Zahraa
    Shams, Mahmoud Y.
    Elshewey, Ahmed M.
    El-kenawy, El-Sayed M.
    Ibrahim, Abdelhameed
    Abdelhamid, Abdelaziz A.
    El-dosuky, Mohamed A.
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 74 (01): : 715 - 732
  • [8] Machine learning models and bankruptcy prediction
    Barboza, Flavio
    Kimura, Herbert
    Altman, Edward
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 83 : 405 - 417
  • [9] Enhancing Machine Learning based QoE Prediction by Ensemble Models
    Casas, Pedro
    Seufert, Michael
    Wehner, Nikolas
    Schwind, Anika
    Wamser, Florian
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEMS (ICDCS), 2018, : 1642 - 1647
  • [10] Hypertension Risk Prediction Based on SNPs by Machine Learning Models
    Lajevardi, S. Ali
    Kargari, Mehrdad
    Daneshpour, Maryam S.
    Akbarzadeh, Mahdi
    [J]. CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 18 (01) : 55 - 62