Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

被引:49
|
作者
Tsujinaka, Toshimasa [1 ]
Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi [2 ]
Fujita, Junya [3 ]
Endo, Shunji [4 ]
Kawada, Junji [5 ]
Nakahira, Shin [6 ]
Shimokawa, Toshio [7 ]
Kobayashi, Shogo [8 ]
Yamasaki, Makoto [8 ]
Akamaru, Yusuke [10 ]
Miyamoto, Atsushi [2 ]
Mizushima, Tsunekazu [8 ]
Shimizu, Junzo [11 ]
Umeshita, Koji [8 ]
Ito, Toshinori [8 ,9 ]
Doki, Yuichiro [8 ]
Mori, Masaki [8 ]
机构
[1] Kaizuka City Hosp, Dept Surg, Kaizuka, Osaka 5970015, Japan
[2] Osaka Natl Hosp, Natl Hosp Org, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] NTT West Osaka Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[4] Higashiosaka City Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[5] Osaka Gen Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[6] Kansai Rosai Hosp, Dept Surg, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
[7] Univ Yamanashi, Grad Sch Med & Engn, Yamanashi, Japan
[8] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, Osaka, Japan
[9] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Complementary & Alternat Med, Osaka, Japan
[10] Osaka Koseinenkin Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[11] Osaka Rosai Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
来源
LANCET | 2013年 / 382卷 / 9898期
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; WOUND-INFECTION; PREVENTION; LAPAROTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61780-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Staples have been widely used for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery. The potential advantages of subcuticular sutures compared with staples have not been assessed. We assessed the differences in the frequency of wound complications, including superficial incisional surgical site infection and hypertrophic scar formation, depending on whether subcuticular sutures or staples are used. Methods We did a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial at 24 institutions between June 1, 2009, and Feb 28, 2012. Eligible patients aged 20 years or older, with adequate organ function and undergoing elective open upper or lower gastrointestinal surgery, were randomly assigned preoperatively to either staples or subcuticular sutures for skin closure. Randomisation was done via a computer-generated permuted-block sequence, and was stratified by institution, sex, and type of surgery (ie, upper or lower gastrointestinal surgery). Our primary endpoint was the incidence of wound complications within 30 days of surgery. Analysis was done by intention to treat. This study is registered with UMIN-CTR, UMIN000002480. Findings 1080 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned in a one to one ratio: 562 to subcuticular sutures and 518 to staples. 1072 were eligible for the primary endpoint and 1058 for the secondary endpoint. Of the 558 patients who received subcuticular sutures, 382 underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery and 176 underwent lower gastrointestinal surgery. Wound complications occurred in 47 of 558 patients (8.4%, 95% CI 6.3-11.0). Of the 514 who received staples, 413 underwent upper gastrointestinal surgery and 101 underwent lower gastrointestinal surgery. Wound complications occurred in 59 of 514 (11.5%, 95% CI 8.9-14.6). Overall, the rate of wound complications did not differ significantly between the subcuticular sutures and staples groups (odds ratio 0.709, 95% CI 0.474-1.062; p=0.12). Interpretation The efficacy of subcuticular sutures was not validated as an improvement over a standard procedure for skin closure to reduce the incidence of wound complications after open gastrointestinal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1105 / 1112
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Imamura, Kazuhiro
    Adachi, Kensuke
    Sasaki, Ritsuko
    Monma, Satoko
    Shioiri, Sadaaki
    Seyama, Yasuji
    Miura, Masaru
    Morikawa, Yoshihiko
    Kaneko, Tetsuji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2016, 20 (12) : 2083 - 2092
  • [2] Randomized Comparison of Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Skin Closure After Open Abdominal Surgery: a Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kazuhiro Imamura
    Kensuke Adachi
    Ritsuko Sasaki
    Satoko Monma
    Sadaaki Shioiri
    Yasuji Seyama
    Masaru Miura
    Yoshihiko Morikawa
    Tetsuji Kaneko
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 2083 - 2092
  • [3] Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Yoritaka Matsuno
    Shintaro Yamazaki
    Yusuke Mitsuka
    Hayato Abe
    Masamichi Moriguchi
    Tokio Higaki
    Tadatoshi Takayama
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2021, 45 : 571 - 580
  • [4] Subcuticular Sutures Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Open Liver Resection: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Matsuno, Yoritaka
    Yamazaki, Shintaro
    Mitsuka, Yusuke
    Abe, Hayato
    Moriguchi, Masamichi
    Higaki, Tokio
    Takayama, Tadatoshi
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (02) : 571 - 580
  • [5] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Running Versus Interrupted Subcuticular Sutures for Skin Closure in Open Gastric Surgery
    Inoue, Kentaro
    Michiura, Taku
    Fukui, Junichi
    Mukaide, Hiromi
    Ozaki, Takashi
    Miki, Hirokazu
    Kaibori, Masaki
    Satoi, Sohei
    Kon, Masanori
    Hamada, Madoka
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 2018, 103 (5-6) : 305 - 314
  • [6] Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after primary hip arthroplasty
    Elbardesy, Hany
    Gul, Rehan
    Guerin, Shane
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2021, 87 (01): : 55 - 64
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Wang, Min
    Li, Dewei
    Chen, Rufu
    Huang, Xiaobing
    Li, Jing
    Liu, Yahui
    Liu, Jianhua
    Cheng, Wei
    Chen, Xuemin
    Zhao, Wenxing
    Li, Jingdong
    Tan, Zhijian
    Huang, Heguang
    Li, Deyu
    Zhu, Feng
    Qin, Tingting
    Ma, Jingdong
    Yu, Guangsheng
    Zhou, Baoyong
    Zheng, Shangyou
    Tang, Yichen
    Han, Wei
    Meng, Lingyu
    Ke, Jianji
    Feng, Feng
    Chen, Botao
    Yin, Xinmin
    Chen, Weibo
    Ma, Hongqin
    Xu, Jian
    Liu, Yifeng
    Lin, Ronggui
    Dong, Yadong
    Yu, Yahong
    Liu, Jun
    Zhang, Hang
    Qin, Renyi
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 6 (06): : 438 - 447
  • [8] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Biere, Surya S. A. Y.
    Henegouwen, Mark I. van Berge
    Maas, Kirsten W.
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Rosman, Camiel
    Roig Garcia, Josep
    Gisbertz, Suzanne S.
    Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
    Hollmann, Markus W.
    de lange, Elly S. M.
    Bonjer, H. Jaap
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829): : 1887 - 1892
  • [9] Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
    Khan, Omar
    Nizar, Shiyam
    Vasilikostas, Georgios
    Wan, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2012, 4 (05) : 465 - 466
  • [10] Palliative radiotherapy after oesophageal cancer stenting (ROCS): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial
    Adamson, Douglas
    Byrne, Anthony
    Porter, Catharine
    Blazeby, Jane
    Griffiths, Gareth
    Nelson, Annmarie
    Sewell, Bernadette
    Jones, Mari
    Svobodova, Martina
    Fitzsimmons, Deborah
    Nixon, Lisette
    Fitzgibbon, Jim
    Thomas, Stephen
    Millin, Anthony
    Crosby, Tom
    Staffurth, John
    Hurt, Christopher
    [J]. LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 6 (04): : 292 - 303