Multiobjective genetic programming for maximizing ROC performance

被引:35
|
作者
Wang, Pu [1 ]
Tang, Ke [1 ]
Weise, Thomas [1 ]
Tsang, E. P. K. [2 ]
Yao, Xin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Technol, Nat Inspired Computat & Applicat Lab, Hefei 230027, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Essex, Dept Comp Sci, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Comp Sci, Ctr Excellence Res Computat Intelligence & Applic, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Classification; ROC analysis; AUC; ROCCH; Genetic programming; Evolutionary multiobjective algorithm; Memetic algorithm; Decision tree; CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.neucom.2012.06.054
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In binary classification problems, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) graphs are commonly used for visualizing, organizing and selecting classifiers based on their performances. An important issue in the ROC literature is to obtain the ROC convex hull (ROCCH) that covers potentially optima for a given set of classifiers [1]. Maximizing the ROCCH means to maximize the true positive rate (tpr) and minimize the false positive rate (fpr) for every classifier in ROC space, while tpr and fpr are conflicting with each other. In this paper, we propose multiobjective genetic programming (MOGP) to obtain a group of nondominated classifiers, with which the maximum ROCCH can be achieved. Four different multiobjective frameworks, including Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Decomposition (MOEA/D), Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume (SMS-EMOA), and Approximation-Guided Evolutionary Multi-Objective (AG-EMOA) are adopted into GP, because all of them are successfully applied into many problems and have their own characters. To improve the performance of each individual in GP, we further propose a memetic approach into GP by defining two local search strategies specifically designed for classification problems. Experimental results based on 27 well-known UCI data sets show that MOGP performs significantly better than single objective algorithms such as FGP, GGP, EGP, and MGP, and other traditional machine learning algorithms such as C4.5, Naive Bayes, and PRIE. The experiments also demonstrate the efficacy of the local search operator in the MOGP framework. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 118
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Convex Hull-Based Multiobjective Genetic Programming for Maximizing Receiver Operating Characteristic Performance
    Wang, Pu
    Emmerich, Michael
    Li, Rui
    Tang, Ke
    Baeck, Thomas
    Yao, Xin
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (02) : 188 - 200
  • [2] MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC PROGRAMMING PERFORMANCE COMPARISON IN FINANCIAL INVESTING
    Jakubeci, Martin
    Gregus, Michal
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL DAYS OF STATISTICS AND ECONOMICS, 2015, : 644 - 654
  • [3] Multiobjective Genetic Programming for Nonlinear System Identification
    Ferariu, Lavinia
    Patelli, Alina
    [J]. ADAPTIVE AND NATURAL COMPUTING ALGORITHMS, 2009, 5495 : 233 - 242
  • [4] Multiobjective Genetic Programming of Agent Decision Strategies
    Slapak, Martin
    Neruda, Roman
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (IBICA 2014), 2014, 303 : 173 - 182
  • [5] Enhancing the performance of a multivariable fuzzy controller by means of multiobjective genetic programming and statistical analysis
    Bica, B
    Chipperfield, AJ
    Fleming, PJ
    MacKenzie, S
    [J]. IECON 2000: 26TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES AND INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES, 2000, : 554 - 559
  • [6] On maximizing solution diversity in a multiobjective multidisciplinary genetic algorithm for design optimization
    Gunawan, S
    Farhang-Mehr, A
    Azarm, S
    [J]. MECHANICS BASED DESIGN OF STRUCTURES AND MACHINES, 2004, 32 (04) : 491 - 514
  • [7] A Comparison of three evolutionary strategies for multiobjective genetic programming
    Zhang, Yang
    Rockett, Peter
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2007, 27 (2-3) : 149 - 163
  • [8] Tikhonov Regularization as a Complexity Measure in Multiobjective Genetic Programming
    Ni, Ji
    Rockett, Peter
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2015, 19 (02) : 157 - 166
  • [9] EVALUATION OF INVESTMENT STRATEGIES CREATED BY MULTIOBJECTIVE GENETIC PROGRAMMING
    Jakubeci, Martin
    [J]. FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2015, : 498 - 509
  • [10] The influence of mutation on population dynamics in multiobjective genetic programming
    Khaled Badran
    Peter I. Rockett
    [J]. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2010, 11 : 5 - 33