Barriers to Applying Open Innovation at Universities

被引:0
|
作者
Hassanin, Mahmoud Elsayed Moustafa [1 ]
机构
[1] Tomas Bata Univ, Zlin, Czech Republic
关键词
Open innovation; barrier; networking and competitive advantage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Universities are the main source for developing future creative entrepreneurs and they engage with other sectors in research and knowledge transfers. The role of the university has been enlarged to include not only teaching and research but also regional development under the name of the entrepreneurial university. Traditionally, the so-called "linear model of innovation" ideas flow naturally from university science and technology that can be commercially exploited and turned into economic growth. This paradigm has turned out to be dogmatic because of many reasons. The new paradigm that is called "Open Innovation" can play a vital role in increasing the competitive advantage of the university by using internal and external ideas, while finding internal and external paths to the market. But, there are a lot of barriers that hinder the effective application of the new paradigm. Few articles discuss the barriers from the industry side. There is no research on the university's barriers and related issues. This research tries to provide an overview of the barriers from a university point of view. This paper is based on an interview study. A qualitative research approach was applied to create an in-depth understanding of the challenges. A total of 12 private and public universities in Egypt were studied by using semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The interviews were conducted with around 40 members of selected universities; for instance, Presidents, Vice Presidents, Deans, Professors and administrators. Through the interviews, barriers can be categorized into three main groups: internal, external and mixed factors
引用
收藏
页码:992 / 1001
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers to innovation and sustainability in universities: an international comparison
    Avila, Lucas Veiga
    Beuron, Thiago Antonio
    Brandli, Luciana Londero
    Damke, Luana Ines
    Pereira, Rudiney Soares
    Klein, Leander Luiz
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 20 (05) : 805 - 821
  • [2] Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world
    Avila, Lucas Veiga
    Leal Filho, Walter
    Brandli, Luciana
    Macgregor, Colin J.
    Molthan-Hill, Petra
    Ozuyar, Pinar Gokcin
    Moreira, Rodrigo Martins
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 1268 - 1278
  • [3] Open Innovation in Universities: The Relationship Between Innovation and Commercialisation
    Razak, Arbaiah Abdul
    Murray, Peter A.
    Roberts, David
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND PROCESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 21 (04) : 260 - 269
  • [4] Open Innovation Capacity of the Polish Universities
    Baron, Marcin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2021, 12 (01) : 73 - 95
  • [5] Open Innovation Capacity of the Polish Universities
    Marcin Baron
    [J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2021, 12 : 73 - 95
  • [6] OPEN FOR BUSINESS: UNIVERSITIES, ENTREPRENEURIAL ACADEMICS AND OPEN INNOVATION
    Alexander, Allen T.
    Miller, Kristel
    Fielding, Sean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (06)
  • [7] Does Open Innovation Promote Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Universities?
    Gong, Lei
    Liu, Zhiying
    Zhang, Shuqin
    Jiang, Zihao
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 13487 - 13500
  • [8] The influence of internal barriers on open innovation
    De Faria, Pedro
    Noseleit, Florian
    Los, Bart
    [J]. INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2020, 27 (03) : 205 - 209
  • [9] Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality
    Robert Huggins
    Daniel Prokop
    Piers Thompson
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2020, 45 : 718 - 757
  • [10] Universities in an open innovation system: a UK perspective
    Howells, Jeremy
    Ramlogan, Ronnie
    Cheng, Shu-Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOUR & RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (04) : 440 - +