共 46 条
Distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial cells in effusions by Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin expression: An evidence-based approach
被引:9
|作者:
Kuperman, Michael
[1
]
Florence, Roxanne R.
[1
]
Pantanowitz, Liron
[2
]
Visintainer, Paul F.
[3
]
Cibas, Edmund S.
[4
]
Otis, Christopher N.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baystate Med Ctr, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat Res Core, Baystate Med Ctr, Springfield, MA 01199 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词:
Glut-1;
EMA;
mesothelioma;
cytology;
effusion;
immunocytochemistry;
evidence-based pathology;
DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS;
CYTOLOGIC EVALUATION;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
TOMOGRAPHY;
ONCOLOGY;
PET;
D O I:
10.1002/dc.21800
中图分类号:
R446 [实验室诊断];
R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号:
1001 ;
摘要:
Distinguishing malignant mesothelioma (MM) from reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RM) may be difficult in effusions. This study tested the hypothesis that immunocytochemistry (IC) in effusion cell blocks (CB) can distinguish MM from RM and that the results may be applied to individual specimens. External validation of a risk score (RS) model associating sensitivity and specificity was applied to an external set of MM and RM specimens from a separate institution. Forty three effusion cytology CBs of 25 confirmed malignant mesotheliomas were compared to CBs of 23 benign mesothelial effusions without inflammation and 13 reactive mesothelial proliferations associated with inflammation. Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin expression were evaluated by immunocytochemistry on CBs. Each antibody was compared using ROC values, where the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90, 0.82, and 0.84 for Glut-1, EMA, and Desmin, respectively. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was applied to a combination of Glut-1 and EMA. A combined ROC curve was modeled for Glut-1 and EMA (AUC = 0.93). A RS = 2 x (Glut-1%) + 1 x (EMA%) was created from this ROC curve. When applied to an external set of MM and RM, the RS resulted in an ROC with AUC = 0.91. In conclusion, a RS derived from a LR of Glut-1 and EMA IC greatly improves the distinction between MM from RM cells in individual effusions. The study illustrates principles of evidence-based pathology concerning internal and external test performance in the differential diagnosis of MM versus RM. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 140
页数:10
相关论文