Diagnostic Utility of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Azad, Tej D. [1 ]
Pendharkar, Arjun V. [1 ]
Nguyen, Viet [2 ]
Pan, James [1 ]
Connolly, Ian D. [1 ]
Veeravagu, Anand [1 ]
Popat, Rita [3 ]
Ratliff, John K. [1 ]
Grant, Gerald A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2018年 / 31卷 / 03期
关键词
intramedullary spinal cord tumor; evidence-based medicine; meta-analysis; intraoperative neuromonitoring; motor-evoked potential; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; SURGERY; DEFICITS; STIMULATION; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000628
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic utility of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for detecting postoperative injury in resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT). Summary of Background Data: Surgical management of IMSCT can involve key neurological and vascular structures. IONM aims to assess the functional integrity of susceptible elements in real time. The diagnostic value of IONM for ISMCT has not been systematically evaluated. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for studies investigating the use of IONM for IMSCT and conducted a meta-analysis of diagnostic capability. Results: Our search produced 257 citations. After application of exclusion criteria, 21 studies remained, 10 American Academy of Neurology grade III and 11 American Academy of Neurology grade IV. We found that a strong pooled mean sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 84-94] and a weaker pooled mean specificity of 82% (95% CI, 70-90) for motor-evoked potential (MEP) recording changes. Somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) recording changes yielded pooled sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 75-91) and pooled specificity of 72% (95% CI, 57-83). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio for MEP was 55.7 (95% CI, 26.3-119.1) and 14.3 (95% CI, 5.47-37.3) for SSEP. Bivariate analysis yielded summary receiver operative characteristic curves with area under the curve of 91.8% for MEPs and 86.3% for SSEPs. Conclusions: MEPs and SSEPs appear to be more sensitive than specific for detection of postoperative injury. Patients with perioperative neurological deficits are 56 times more likely to have had changes in MEPs during the procedure. We observed considerable variability in alarm criteria and interventions in response to IONM changes, indicating the need for prospective studies capable of defining standardized alarm criteria and responses.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 119
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring
    Sala, Francesco
    Bricolo, Albino
    Faccioli, Franco
    Lanteri, Paola
    Gerosa, Massimo
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (Suppl 2) : S130 - S139
  • [2] Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors: the role of intraoperative (neurophysiological) monitoring
    Francesco Sala
    Albino Bricolo
    Franco Faccioli
    Paola Lanteri
    Massimo Gerosa
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2007, 16 : 130 - 139
  • [3] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Daniel, Jefferson Walter
    Botelho, Ricardo Vieira
    Milano, Jeronimo Buzetti
    Dantas, Fernando Rolemberg
    Onishi, Franz Jooji
    Neto, Eloy Rusafa
    Bertolini, Eduardo de Freitas
    Duva Borgheresi, Marcelo Antonio
    Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (16) : 1154 - 1160
  • [4] Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Patients with Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumor: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Case Series
    Rijs, Koen
    Klimek, Markus
    Scheltens-de Boer, Marjan
    Biesheuvel, Karla
    Harhangi, Biswadjiet S.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : 498 - +
  • [5] The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery
    Liu K.
    Ma C.
    Li D.
    Li H.
    Dong X.
    Liu B.
    Yu Y.
    Fan Y.
    Song H.
    [J]. Chinese Neurosurgical Journal, 9 (1)
  • [6] The role of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery
    Liu Kai
    Ma Chengyuan
    Li Dapeng
    Li Haisong
    Dong Xuechao
    Liu Bo
    Yu Ying
    Fan Yuxiang
    Song Hongmei
    [J]. 中华神经外科杂志(英文), 2024, 10 (01)
  • [7] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring During Spinal Cord Stimulation Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Schlaeppi, Janine-Ai
    Schreen, Raphael
    Seidel, Kathleen
    Pollo, Claudio
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (07): : 1319 - 1327
  • [8] Utility of Intraoperative Monitoring in the Resection of Spinal Cord Tumors
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Mistry, Akshitkumar M.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Ladner, Travis
    Kothari, Parth
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Stannard, Blaine
    Vasquez, Raul A.
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (04) : 287 - 294
  • [9] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Spine Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Response
    Daniel, Jefferson W.
    Botelho, Ricardo Vieira
    Buzetti, Jeronimo Milano
    Dantas, Fernando Rolemberg
    Onishi, Franz
    Neto, Eloy Russafa
    Bertolini, Eduardo de Freitas
    Borgheresi, Marcelo Duva
    Joaquim, Andrei Fernandes
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (13) : E796 - E797
  • [10] Multimodal Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors: A 10-Year Single Center Experience
    Tropeano, Maria Pia
    Rossini, Zefferino
    Franzini, Andrea
    Capo, Gabriele
    Olei, Simone
    De Robertis, Mario
    Milani, Daniela
    Fornari, Maurizio
    Pessina, Federico
    [J]. CANCERS, 2024, 16 (01)