Prognosis of surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome in children

被引:12
|
作者
Sysoev, Kirill [1 ]
Tadevosyan, Arsen [1 ]
Samochernykh, Konstantin [1 ]
Khachatryan, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Almazov Natl Med Res Ctr, Akkuratova Str 2, St Petersburg, Russia
关键词
Tethered cord syndrome; Surgical treatment; Predicting factors; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s00381-017-3630-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to identify the factors relevant to the prognosis of the outcome of the surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome (TCS). Methods The results of surgical treatment performed on 58 children with TCS were analyzed, with follow-up periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years. The data of preoperative clinical and instrumental examinations, as well as those of intraoperative electrophysiological diagnostics and morphometry, were compared with the dynamics of the TCS clinical presentation. Results The recovery rate was significantly higher in children with filum terminale abnormality (p = 0.014), as well as grade I tethering (p = 0.0037), and when the spinal cord tracts at the level of intervention were intact (p = 0.018). Complete untethering (p = 0.04) and a low threshold value of amperage in direct stimulation (< 1 mA) (p = 0.016) were identified as factors for a favorable outcome. Worsening of neurological symptoms was more frequent in children operated over the age of 10 (p = 0.03), when the TCS was manifested exclusively through the pelvic dysfunction (p = 0.00004), if the F-wave block is less than 30% (p = 0.0045) and the stimulation threshold during root mapping ranged from 1 to 5 mA (p = 0.01). Conclusion The operation is recommended when structural changes are minimal. In case of severe structural changes, if the spinal cord tracts are intact, the indications for operation are determined by the risk of irreversible structural changes due to the natural course of the disease, although the risks are substantially higher.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 310
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognosis of surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome in children
    Sysoev, Kirill
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 429 : 51 - 52
  • [2] Prognosis of surgical treatment of the tethered cord syndrome in children
    Kirill Sysoev
    Arsen Tadevosyan
    Konstantin Samochernykh
    William Khachatryan
    Child's Nervous System, 2018, 34 : 305 - 310
  • [3] Surgical Outcome of Children and Adolescents with Tethered Cord Syndrome
    Seki, Toshitaka
    Hida, Kazutoshi
    Yano, Shunsuke
    Sasamori, Toru
    Hamauch, Shuji
    Koyanagi, Izumi
    Houkin, Kiyohiro
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (05) : 940 - 944
  • [4] Tethered cord syndrome in children - impact of surgical treatment on functional neurological and urological outcome
    Daszkiewicz, Pawel
    Barszcz, Slawomir
    Roszkowski, Marcin
    Maryniak, Agnieszka
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2007, 41 (05) : 427 - 435
  • [5] Surgical treatment of tethered spinal cord syndrome in a dog with myelomeningocele
    Shamir, M
    Rochkind, S
    Johnston, D
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2001, 148 (24) : 755 - 756
  • [6] Surgical treatment of tethered cord syndrome showed promising outcome in young children with short duration
    Liu, M.
    Deng, W.
    Lu, Y. Y.
    He, Y. Z.
    Huang, L. Y.
    DU, H.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (05) : 1831 - 1836
  • [7] Surgical results of the tethered cord syndrome
    Correia, J
    Calado, E
    Romero, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH WORLD CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 61 - 64
  • [8] Surgical treatment for delayed tethered cord syndrome after repair of myelomeningocele
    Shirane, R
    Yoshimoto, T
    SPINA BIFIDA, 1999, : 126 - 126
  • [9] Long-term outcomes of surgical treatment for tethered cord syndrome
    Haro, H
    Komori, H
    Okawa, A
    Kawabata, S
    Shinomiya, K
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (01): : 16 - 20
  • [10] Tethered cord syndrome in adults and children
    Yamada, S
    NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 26 (07) : 717 - 718