Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Human Dignity and Transhumanism: Do Anthro-Technological Devices Have Moral Status?"

被引:0
|
作者
Jotterand, Fabrice [1 ]
机构
[1] UT SW Med Ctr, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2010年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
Human dignity; Posthuman dignity; Transhumanism; UNESCO Declaration on Bioethics;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2010.497388
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, I focus on the concept of human dignity and critically assess whether such a concept, as used in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, is indeed a useful tool for bioethical debates. However, I consider this concept within the context of the development of emerging technologies, that is, with a particular focus on transhumanism. The question I address is not whether attaching artificial limbs or enhancing particular traits or capacities would dehumanize or undignify persons but whether nonbiological entities introduced into or attached to the human body contribute to the "augmentation" of human dignity. First, I outline briefly how the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights uses the concept of dignity. Second, I look at the possibility of a universal bioethics in relation to the concept of human dignity. Third, I examine the concept of posthuman dignity and whether the concept of human dignity as construed in the declaration has any relevance to posthuman dignity.
引用
收藏
页码:W6 / W8
页数:3
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Do Clinicians Have a Duty to Participate in Pragmatic Clinical Trials?"
    Garland, Andrew
    Morain, Stephanie
    Sugarman, Jeremy
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (10): : W1 - W3
  • [2] Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Do Researchers Have an Obligation to Actively Look for Genetic Incidental Findings?"
    Gliwa, Catherine
    Berkman, Benjamin E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2013, 13 (05): : W10 - W11