Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosythesis and breast MRI to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: patient tolerance and preference

被引:1
|
作者
Savaridas, Sarah L. [1 ]
Whelehan, Patsy [1 ]
Warwick, Violet R. [1 ]
Vinnicombe, Sarah J. [1 ,2 ]
Evans, Andrew J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Sch Med, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Gloucestershire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Cheltenham, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2022年 / 95卷 / 1134期
关键词
SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY CESM; CANCER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis (CE-DBT) is a novel imaging technique, combining contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and tomosynthesis. This may offer an alternative imaging technique to breast MRI for monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This paper addresses patient experience and preference regarding the two techniques.Methods: Conducted as part of a prospective pilot study; patients were asked to complete questionnaires pertaining to their experience of CE-DBT and MRI following pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Questionnaires consisted of eight questions answered on a categorical scale, two using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and a question to indicate preference of imaging technique. Statistical analysis was performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test and McNemar test for related samples using SPSS v. 25.Results: 18 patients were enrolled in the pilot study. Matched CE-DBT and MRI questionnaires were completed after 22 patient episodes. Patient preference was indicated after 31 patient episodes. Overall, on 77% of occasions patients preferred CE-DBT with no difference between pre-treatment and end-of-treatment imaging. Overall experience (p = 0.008), non-breast pain (p = 0.046), anxiety measured using VAS (p = 0.003), and feeling of being put at ease by staff (p = 0.023) was better for CE-DBT. However, more breast pain was experienced during CE-DBT when measured on both VAS (p = 0.011) and categorical scale (p = 0.021).Conclusion: Our paper suggests that patients prefer CE-DBT to MRI, adding further evidence in favour of contrast-enhanced mammographic techniques.Advances in knowledge: Contrast mammographic techniques offer an alternative, more accessible imaging technique to breast MRI. Whilst other studies have addressed patient experience of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, this is the first study to directly explore patient preference for CE-DBT over MRI in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, finding that overall, patients preferred CE-DBT despite the relatively long breast compression.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can unenhanced MRI of the breast replace contrast-enhanced MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Marincola, Beatrice Cavallo
    Telesca, Marianna
    Zaccagna, Fulvio
    Riemer, Frank
    Anzidei, Michele
    Catalano, Carlo
    Pediconi, Federica
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [2] DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI FOR PREDICTION OF PATHOLOGIC RESPONSE TO NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
    Patel, A. P.
    Chang, D.
    Chen, J.
    Lin, M.
    Mehta, R. S.
    Su, M.
    Nalcioglu, O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 59 (01) : 184 - 185
  • [3] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Prediction of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Initial Results
    Loo, Claudette E.
    Teertstra, H. Jelle
    Rodenhuis, Sjoerd
    de Vijver, Marc J. van
    Hannemann, Juliane
    Muller, Saar H.
    Peeters, Marie-Jeanne Vrancken
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (05) : 1331 - 1338
  • [4] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI as a Predictor of Patient Outcome with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
    Li, S. P.
    Padhani, A. R.
    Taylor, N. J.
    Ah-See, M-L W.
    Beresford, M. J.
    Stirling, J. J.
    Stott, D.
    Collins, D. J.
    d'Arcy, J. A.
    Makris, A.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (24) : 568S - 568S
  • [5] Early Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Ultrasound in Breast Cancer
    Kim, Yunju
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Song, Byung Joo
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Yim, Kwang-il
    Lee, Ahwon
    Nam, Yoonho
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 19 (04) : 682 - 691
  • [6] Changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as an early predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer
    Ah-See, MW
    Makris, A
    Taylor, NJ
    Harrison, M
    Ostler, PJ
    Richman, PI
    Stirling, JJ
    Burcombe, RJ
    Leach, MO
    Pittam, MR
    Ravichandran, D
    D'Arcy, JA
    Padhani, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 : S22 - S22
  • [7] Quantitative Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Dynamic Contrast-enhanced 3T Breast MRI
    Murakami, Wakana
    Choi, Hyung Won
    Joines, Melissa M.
    Hoyt, Anne
    Doepke, Laura
    McCann, Kelly E.
    Salamon, Noriko
    Sayre, James
    Lee-Felker, Stephanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (02) : 168 - 176
  • [8] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Early Prediction of Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Lee, Youn Joo
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Kim, Yun Ju
    [J]. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2019, 40 (02): : 193 - 204
  • [9] Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for early prediction of response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
    Guo, Jiabao
    Wang, Bao-Hua
    He, Mengna
    Fu, Peifen
    Yao, Minya
    Jiang, Tian'an
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [10] Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast
    Drew, PJ
    Kerin, MJ
    Mahapatra, T
    Malone, C
    Monson, JRT
    Turnbull, LW
    Fox, JN
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (07): : 617 - 620