An improved 2.75D method relating pressure distributions of 2D airfoils and 3D wings

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Zhen-Ming [1 ]
Han, Zhong-Hua [1 ]
Song, Wen-Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Inst Aerodynam & Multidisciplinary Design Optimiz, Sch Aeronaut, Natl Key Lab Sci & Technol Aerodynam Design & Res, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
2.75D method; Aerodynamic design; Tapered swept wing; Pressure distribution transformation; Transonic flow; AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2022.107789
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Since the 2.75D method takes both wing sweep and taper into consideration, it can build a transformation relation for pressure distributions between a 2D airfoil and a 3D wing under the assumption of conical flow. However, it is observed that the classical 2.75D method proposed by Lock has insufficient transformation accuracy in subsonic flow regions on transonic and subsonic wings. This article proposes an improved 2.75D method to address this problem. For subsonic flow region(s), a method based on Kaman-Tsien compressibility correction is proposed; for supersonic flow region(s), the original method of enforcing an equal normal Mach number between an airfoil and the corresponding wing section is used. Lock's and the improved methods are demonstrated by test cases of transonic and subsonic wings. Results show the transformation accuracy of pressure distributions between 2D airfoils and 3D wings is dramatically improved using the proposed method. The application of these methods to the pressure distribution design for a tapered swept wing section is also demonstrated. The design optimization using the improved 2.75D method leads to a design result being more approximate to a 3D tapered swept wing with a computation effort similar to a 2D airfoil design. (c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2.75D: Boosting learning by representing 3D Medical imaging to 2D features for small data
    Wang, Xin
    Su, Ruisheng
    Xie, Weiyi
    Wang, Wenjin
    Xu, Yi
    Mann, Ritse
    Han, Jungong
    Tan, Tao
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2023, 84
  • [2] Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Probabilistic Joint Inversion of 2D (2.75D) Gravity and Magnetic Data
    Zunino, Andrea
    Ghirotto, Alessandro
    Armadillo, Egidio
    Fichtner, Andreas
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (20)
  • [3] An Improved Method for Building A 3D Model from 2D DICOM
    Van Sinh Nguyen
    Manh Ha Tran
    Hoang Minh Quang Vu
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS (ACOMP), 2018, : 125 - 131
  • [4] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [5] A "LEARN 2D, APPLY 3D" METHOD FOR 3D DECONVOLUTION MICROSCOPY
    Soulez, Ferreol
    2014 IEEE 11th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), 2014, : 1075 - 1078
  • [6] Interactive Visualization and Computation of 2D and 3D Probability Distributions
    Bobrovnikov M.
    Chai J.T.
    Dinov I.D.
    SN Computer Science, 3 (4)
  • [7] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D FRACTAL DISTRIBUTIONS IN RESERVOIR SIMULATIONS
    BEIER, RA
    HARDY, HH
    SPE RESERVOIR ENGINEERING, 1994, 9 (03): : 195 - 200
  • [8] Comparison of 2D and 3D fractal distributions in reservoir simulations
    Beier, R.A.
    Hardy, H.H.
    SPE Reservoir Engineering (Society of Petroleum Engineers), 1994, 9 (03): : 195 - 200
  • [9] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [10] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248