Design and Evaluation of a Human-in-the-Loop Connected Cruise Control

被引:2
|
作者
Chen, Zheng [1 ]
Park, Byungkyu Brian [2 ]
Hu, Jia [3 ]
机构
[1] PCI Technol Grp Co Ltd, Guangzhou 510000, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Virginia, Engn Syst & Environm Dept, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Transportat Engn, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Delays; Stability analysis; Sensors; Engines; Vehicular ad hoc networks; Vehicle-to-infrastructure; Uncertainty; Connected vehicle; connected cruise control human driver; string stability; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION; VEHICLE SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC FLOW; STABILITY; DYNAMICS; DELAY;
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2022.3172507
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The performance of automated vehicle can be greatly improved by enabling vehicle-to-vehicle communication. An example of such applications is Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) along the highway. Although the adoption rate of vehicular connectivity is predicted to grow rapidly, CACC can only benefit vehicles that are both connected and automated. To take a full advantage of vehicular connectivity, a human-in-the-loop Connected Cruise Control (hCCC) algorithm is developed for human-driven connected vehicle. In hCCC, the human driver remains engaged in the longitudinal control of the vehicle, and hCCC controller applies additional acceleration/deceleration on top of human actions according to the received status of preceding vehicle. By allowing coexistence of the automatic control and driver's actions in a beneficial way, hCCC helps the human driver stabilize the vehicle more efficiently and safely. The proposed hCCC inherits the feedback-feedforward control structure and velocity-dependent spacing policy from the typical CACC systems. String stability analysis shows that hCCC can offer broader string-stable ranges of human parameters than human driving alone or the existing acceleration-based Connected Cruise Control (CCC), indicating a better capability to mitigate traffic disturbance with the uncertain human behaviors. The desirable properties of hCCC were validated in driving simulator experiments, which showed that hCCC could reduce 36.8% acceleration, 31.2% time-gap fluctuation, 81.2% exposure time to unsafe driving situations, and 15.8% fuel consumption from those of human driving alone. In addition, two derivative designs of hCCC are proposed and proven effective, further lowering down the practice threshold of hCCC.
引用
收藏
页码:8104 / 8115
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An embodiment paradigm in evaluation of human-in-the-loop control
    Froehner, Jakob
    Beckerle, Philipp
    Endo, Satoshi
    Hirche, Sandra
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 51 (34): : 104 - 109
  • [2] Human-in-the-Loop Ekranoplane Motion Control System Design
    Brodsky, Sergey A.
    Nebylov, Alexander, V
    Panferov, Alexander, I
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 6TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AEROSPACE (METROAEROSPACE), 2019, : 417 - 422
  • [3] Robotic Leg Illusion: System Design and Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation
    Penner, Dimitri
    Abrams, Anna M. H.
    Overath, Philipp
    Vogt, Joachim
    Beckerle, Philipp
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS, 2019, 49 (04) : 372 - 380
  • [4] Inner-Loop Reference Governor Design with an Application to Human-in-the-Loop Control
    Kalabic, Uros
    Di Cairano, Stefano
    [J]. 2018 EUROPEAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ECC), 2018, : 1015 - 1020
  • [5] Human-in-the-loop speech-design system and its evaluation
    Kondo, Daichi
    Morise, Masanori
    [J]. 2019 ASIA-PACIFIC SIGNAL AND INFORMATION PROCESSING ASSOCIATION ANNUAL SUMMIT AND CONFERENCE (APSIPA ASC), 2019, : 608 - 612
  • [6] HIERARCHICAL DESIGN FOR CONNECTED CRUISE CONTROL
    Zhang, Linjun
    He, Chaozhe
    Sun, Jing
    Orosz, Gabor
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 8TH ANNUAL DYNAMIC SYSTEMS AND CONTROL CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 1, 2016,
  • [7] An integrated design for human-in-the-loop disassembly
    Tang, Ying
    Grochowski, David E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, SENSING AND CONTROL, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 774 - 779
  • [8] A Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of ACAS Xu
    Rorie, R. Conrad
    Smith, Casey
    Sadler, Garrett
    Monk, Kevin J.
    Tyson, Terence L.
    Keeler, Jillian
    [J]. 2020 AIAA/IEEE 39TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC) PROCEEDINGS, 2020,
  • [9] Dynamic Mechanism Design for Human-in-the-Loop Control of Building Energy Consumption
    Schuette, Maximilian
    Hota, Ashish R.
    Eichler, Annika
    Lygeros, John
    [J]. 2019 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2019, : 247 - 252
  • [10] Human-in-the-Loop Control: Applications and Categorization
    Samad, Tariq
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (05): : 311 - 317