Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective assessment of postoperative pain

被引:102
|
作者
Webster, TM [1 ]
Herrell, SD [1 ]
Chang, SS [1 ]
Cookson, MS [1 ]
Baumgartner, RG [1 ]
Anderson, LW [1 ]
Smith, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2005年 / 174卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate; robotics; prostatectomy; laparoscopy; pain;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000169455.25510.ff
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Laparoscopic prostatectomy, whether or not coupled with robotic assistance, is often considered less invasive than open radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Minimal postoperative pain has been reported following robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) but there have been few comparative studies with RRP. We compared perioperative narcotic use and patient reported pain in a prospective patient series. Materials and Methods: Between June 2003 and May 2004, 314 patients underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution, including RALP in 159, RRP in 154 and conversion in 1. All patients were treated on a postoperative clinical pathway that included 30 mg ketorolac intravenously immediately postoperatively, followed by 15 mg intravenously every 6 hours. No regional anesthesia (epidural/spinal) narcotics or patient controlled analgesic pumps were used. All narcotic use was converted to morphine sulfate equivalents for purpose of analysis. A Likert scale of 0 to 10 was used to assess pain on the day of surgery, and on postoperative days 1 and 14. Results: The total mean morphine sulfate equivalent +/- SD in patients in the RALP and RRP groups was low and, when corrected for length of stay, it was not statistically different (22.41 +/- 1.13 vs 23.01 +/- 1.16 mg, p = 0.72). Mean Likert pain perception scores were low at all time points in the RALP and RRP groups but statistically lower on the day of surgery in the RALP cohort (2.05 +/- 1.99 vs 2.60 +/- 2.25, p = 0.027). Patient reported mean pain scores were almost identical for RALP vs RRP on postoperative days 1(1.76 +/- 1.87 vs 1.73 +/- 1.77, p = 0.880) and 14 (2.51 +/- 1.91 Vs 2.42 +/- 1.84, p = 0.722). Conclusions: Perioperative narcotic use and patient reported pain are low regardless of the surgical approach used for radical prostatectomy. RALP did not provide a clinically meaningful decrease in pain compared with RRP, primarily because of the low pain scores reported in each group. Outcomes other than pain will ultimately determine the role of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and RALP.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 914
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy: Assessment of perioperative pain
    Webster, TM
    Herrell, SD
    Baumgartner, RG
    Anderson, L
    Smith, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 44 - 44
  • [2] Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk, Keith J.
    Yu, Hua-yin
    Ulmer, William
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 85 - 89
  • [3] Outcomes assessment in men undergoing open retropubic radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Keith J. Kowalczyk
    Hua-yin Yu
    William Ulmer
    Stephen B. Williams
    Jim C. Hu
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 85 - 89
  • [4] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after aborted retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Kowalczyk K.J.
    Huang A.C.
    Williams S.B.
    Yu H.-Y.
    Hu J.C.
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2013, 7 (3) : 301 - 304
  • [5] Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical Prostatectomy
    Lorenz, Judith
    [J]. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2022, 53 (03) : 220 - 220
  • [6] A comparison of the robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Laviana, A. A.
    Hu, J. C.
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2013, 65 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [7] Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Farnham, SB
    Webster, TM
    Herrell, SD
    Smith, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 188 - 188
  • [8] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EVALUATION OF LEARNING CURVE OUTCOMES LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES WITH RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    Caballero Romeu, J. P.
    Palacios Ramos, J.
    Pereira Arias, J. G.
    Gamarra Quintanilla, M.
    Astobieta Odriozola, A.
    Ibarluzea Gonzalez, G.
    [J]. ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2008, 32 (10): : 968 - 975
  • [9] Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
    Ergin, Giray
    Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
    Kirac, Mustafa
    Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
    Kopru, Burak
    Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge
    Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (01): : 83 - 88
  • [10] Continence recovery after robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy or retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective, comparative, non-randomized study
    Ficarra, V.
    Iafrate, M.
    Galfano, A.
    Fracalanza, S.
    D'Ella, C.
    Lamon, C.
    Cavalleri, S.
    Artilbani, W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 243 - 243