Perceiving university students' opinions from Google app reviews

被引:2
|
作者
Ranjan, Sakshi [1 ]
Mishra, Subhankar [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Utkal Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Bhubaneswar 751004, India
[2] Natl Inst Sci Educ Res, Sch Comp Sci, Bhubaneswar, India
[3] Homi Bhabha Natl Inst, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
来源
关键词
deep learning; Google app reviews; machine learning; natural language processing; opinion mining; sentiment analysis; ENSEMBLE SCHEME; SENTIMENT; FRAMEWORK; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/cpe.6800
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Google app market captures the school of thought of users from every corner of the globe via ratings and text reviews, in a multilinguistic arena. The critique's viewpoint regarding an app is proportional to their satisfaction level. The potential information from the reviews cannot be extracted manually, due to its exponential growth. So, sentiment analysis, by machine learning and deep learning algorithms employing NLP, explicitly uncovers and interprets the emotions. This study performs the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identifies the university students' behavior toward the app market via exploratory analysis. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TP, TF, and TF-IDF text representation scheme and evaluated its performance on Bagging, an ensemble learning method. We used word embedding, GloVe, on the deep learning paradigms. Our model was trained on Google app reviews and tested on students' app reviews (SAR). The various combinations of these algorithms were compared among each other using F-score and accuracy and inferences were highlighted graphically. SVM, among other classifiers, gave fruitful accuracy (93.41%), F-score (0.89) on bi-gram + TF-IDF scheme. Bagging enhanced the performance of LR and NB with accuracy 87.88% and 86.69% and F-score 0.86 and 0.78 respectively. Overall, LSTM on Glove embedding recorded the highest accuracy (95.2%) and F-score (0.88).
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrieving Diverse Opinions from App Reviews
    Guzman, Emitza
    Aly, Omar
    Bruegge, Bernd
    2015 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND MEASUREMENT (ESEM), 2015, : 21 - 30
  • [2] INVESTIGATING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' OPINIONS IN RELATION TO OPEN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    Ozen, Rasit
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2007, 8 (02): : 14 - 28
  • [3] Opinions of University Students on Technology Literacy
    Saltanat, Adikanova
    Kaldykul, Sarbassova
    Zaure, Kabdrakhmanova
    Saniya, Kubentayeva
    Gulbanu, Uristenbekova
    Karas, Kaziyev
    Bagdat, Baimukhanbetov
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2022, 12 (02): : 141 - 154
  • [4] OPINIONS OF NURSING STUDENTS ON UNIVERSITY MENTORING
    Dolores Guerra-Martin, Maria
    Lima Rodriguez, Joaquin Salvador
    Lima Serrano, Marta
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ORIENTACION Y PSICOPEDAGOGIA, 2016, 27 (03): : 104 - 121
  • [5] UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' OPINIONS ON ETHICAL ISSUES
    Svarcova, Eva
    EFFICIENCY AND RESPONSIBILITY IN EDUCATION 2013, 2013, : 595 - 602
  • [6] OPINIONS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS ON APPLICATION IN PRACTICE
    Onderkova, Ivana
    Fries, Jrii
    Jurman, Josef
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 907 - 914
  • [7] User Reviews of Top Mobile Apps in Apple and Google App Stores
    Mcilroy, Stuart
    Shang, Weiyi
    Ali, Nasir
    Hassan, Ahmed E.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2017, 60 (11) : 62 - 67
  • [8] Exploring the reviews of Google Maps to assess the user opinions about public libraries
    Khan, Aasif Mohammad
    Loan, Fayaz Ahmad
    LIBRARY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 43 (8-9) : 601 - 615
  • [9] Phrase-Based Extraction of User Opinions in Mobile App Reviews
    Phong Minh Vu
    Hung Viet Pham
    Tam The Nguyen
    Tung Thanh Nguyen
    2016 31ST IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ASE), 2016, : 726 - 731
  • [10] Mining Opinions from University Students' Feedback using Text Analytics
    Lee, Angela S. H.
    Lim, Tong-Ming
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY, 2016, 4 (01): : 26 - 33