Ethics of Clinical Science in a Public Health Emergency: Drug Discovery at the Bedside

被引:29
|
作者
Edwards, Sarah J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1E 6BT, England
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS | 2013年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
research ethics; public health; INFLUENZA; INEQUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2013.813597
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical research under the usual regulatory constraints may be difficult or even impossible in a public health emergency. Regulators must seek to strike a good balance in granting as wide therapeutic access to new drugs as possible at the same time as gathering sound evidence of safety and effectiveness. To inform current policy, I reexamine the philosophical rationale for restricting new medicines to clinical trials, at any stage and for any population of patients (which resides in the precautionary principle), to show that its objective to protect public health, now or in the future, could soon be defeated in a pandemic. Providing wider therapeutic access and coordinating observations and natural experiments, including service delivery by cluster (wedged cluster trials), may provide such a balance. However, there are important questions of fairness to resolve before any such research can proceed.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 14
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条