The differential impact of cognitive style on the relationship between financial education and financial literacy

被引:0
|
作者
Estelami, Hooman [1 ]
Estelami, Nicole N. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, Gabelli Sch Business, 400 Westchester Ave, West Harrison, NY 10640 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, Gabelli Sch Business, 441 East Fordham Rd, Bronx, NY 10458 USA
关键词
Financial literacy; Financial education; Consumer financial wellbeing; BEHAVIOR; DECISIONS; SAVINGS;
D O I
10.1057/s41264-022-00204-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Past studies have examined the role of financial education on financial literacy, often with mixed results. While some studies have shown a positive effect, others have indicated null or even negative effects. Given that much public faith is given to financial education as a means for improving consumers' financial wellbeing, a deeper understanding of the relationship between financial education and financial literacy is needed. A factor that may moderate this important relationship is cognitive style, which reflects the information processing strategies of consumers. At the two extremes of the cognitive style spectrum are analytical and intuitive consumers, and in the intermediate ranges are adaptive consumers who combine analysis and intuition to different degrees. Using a national panel of American consumers, the moderating role that cognitive style plays in this relationship is empirically examined. The findings indicate that while consumers with analytical and intuitive cognitive styles develop higher financial literacy levels as a result of financial education, the financial literacy levels for consumers with adaptive cognitive styles diminishes with financial education. The potential role of self-assessed investment knowledge in this relationship is examined and implications on curriculum design for financial education programs as well as related research needs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 256
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationship between financial disputes and financial literacy
    Shen, Chung-Hua
    Lin, Shih-Jie
    Tang, De-Piao
    Hsiao, Yu-Jen
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2016, 36 : 46 - 65
  • [2] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DECISION-MAKING STYLE OF ENTREPRENEURS AND THEIR FINANCIAL LITERACY
    Okicic, Jasmina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2019), 2019, : 655 - 668
  • [3] OBJECTIVE, SUBJECTIVE FINANCIAL LITERACY INFLUENCE ON COGNITIVE STYLE AND FINANCIAL RISK PERCEPTION
    Aren, Selim
    Akgunes, Ahmet Oguz
    [J]. ISMC 2019 - 15TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2019, 71 : 338 - 345
  • [4] Does Financial Education Impact Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior, and If So, When?
    Kaiser, Tim
    Menkhoff, Lukas
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 31 (03): : 611 - 630
  • [5] The Relationship Between Financial Education in Young Adults and Financial Literacy: A Review of the Literature in Canada and the United States
    Adesina, Folasade
    Carnaghan, Carla
    Smith, James
    [J]. ACCOUNTING PERSPECTIVES, 2024,
  • [6] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINANCIAL SATISFACTION AND FINANCIAL LITERACY: EXPLORING GENDER DIFFERENCES
    Skreblin Kirbis, Ivona
    Vehovec, Maja
    Galic, Zvonimir
    [J]. DRUSTVENA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2017, 26 (02): : 165 - 185
  • [7] Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Downstream Financial Behaviors
    Fernandes, Daniel
    Lynch, John G., Jr.
    Netemeyer, Richard G.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (08) : 1861 - 1883
  • [8] The impact of financial literacy on financial inclusion
    Reddy, Krishna
    Wallace, Damien
    Wellalage, Nirosha Hewa
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [9] Financial Education and Financial Literacy by Income and Education Groups
    Wagner, Jamie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL COUNSELING AND PLANNING, 2019, 30 (01): : 132 - 141
  • [10] Financial education and financial literacy in the Czech education system
    Opletalova, Alena
    [J]. 5th ICEEPSY International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology, 2015, 171 : 1176 - 1184