Daily water-level forecasting for multiple polish lakes using multiple data-driven models

被引:8
|
作者
Zhu, Senlin [1 ]
Ji, Qingfeng [1 ]
Ptak, Mariusz [2 ]
Sojka, Mariusz [3 ]
Keramatfar, Abdalsamad [4 ]
Chau, Kwok Wing [5 ]
Band, Shahab S. S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Hydraul Sci & Engn, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Dept Hydrol & Water Management, Poznan, Poland
[3] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Land Improvement Environm Dev & Spatial Manag, Poznan, Poland
[4] Acecr, Data Analyt Dept, SID, Tehran, Iran
[5] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[6] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, Touliu, Yunlin, Taiwan
来源
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL | 2023年 / 189卷 / 02期
关键词
attention mechanism; deep learning; lakes; machine learning; water level; FLUCTUATIONS; MACHINE; PREDICTION; IMPACTS; VAN;
D O I
10.1111/geoj.12488
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Water level in lakes fluctuates frequently due to the impact of natural and anthropogenic forcing. Frequent fluctuations of water level will impact lake ecosystems, and it is thus of great significance to have a good knowledge of water-level dynamics in lakes. However, forecasting daily water-level fluctuation in lake systems remains a tough task due to its non-linearity and complexity. In this study, two deep data-driven models, including gated recurrent unit (GRU) and long short-term memory (LSTM), were coupled with attention mechanism for the forecasting of daily water level in lakes for the first time. Daily water-level times series in five lowland lakes in Poland were used to evaluate the models. Root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean average error (MAE) were used for the evaluation of model performance. The modelling results were compared with the traditional feed-forward neural networks (FFNN), GRU, LSTM, and zero-order forecast. The modelling results showed that sequential deep learning models do not outperform feed-forward models in all cases. In most cases, LSTM with attention mechanism (average RMSE = 0.88 cm, average MAE = 0.69 cm) outperforms GRU with attention mechanism (average RMSE = 1.00 cm, average MAE = 0.81 cm). However, attention mechanism did not help to improve the accuracy of the GRU and LSTM for most cases. Based on the average performance in different lakes, GRU performs the best among the deep learning models (average RMSE = 0.84 cm, average MAE = 0.66 cm). Zero-order forecast models perform better than deep learning models for predicting tomorrow (average RMSE = 0.71 cm, average MAE = 0.39 cm), while deep learning models perform better as the horizon of prediction increases.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 369
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forecasting of water level in multiple temperate lakes using machine learning models
    Zhu, Senlin
    Hrnjica, Bahrudin
    Ptak, Mariusz
    Choinski, Adam
    Sivakumar, Bellie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 585
  • [2] Multiple strategies for a novel hybrid forecasting algorithm of ozone based on data-driven models
    Cheng, Yong
    Zhu, Qiao
    Peng, Yan
    Huang, Xiao-Feng
    He, Ling-Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 326
  • [3] A Comparative Study of Data-driven Models for Groundwater Level Forecasting
    R. Sarma
    S. K. Singh
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2022, 36 : 2741 - 2756
  • [4] A Comparative Study of Data-driven Models for Groundwater Level Forecasting
    Sarma, R.
    Singh, S. K.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (08) : 2741 - 2756
  • [5] Comparison of data-driven techniques for daily streamflow forecasting
    P. de Bourgoing
    A. Malekian
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 11093 - 11106
  • [6] Comparison of data-driven techniques for daily streamflow forecasting
    de Bourgoing, P.
    Malekian, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (10) : 11093 - 11106
  • [7] Building a Data-Driven Multiple Daily Insulin Therapy Model Using Smart Insulin Pens
    Harbison, Rocio
    Hecht, Michele
    MacLeod, Janice
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 16 (03): : 610 - 616
  • [8] Ground-level ozone forecasting using data-driven methods
    Solaiman, T. A.
    Coulibaly, P.
    Kanaroglou, P.
    [J]. AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2008, 1 (04): : 179 - 193
  • [9] Ground-level ozone forecasting using data-driven methods
    T. A. Solaiman
    P. Coulibaly
    P. Kanaroglou
    [J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2008, 1 : 179 - 193
  • [10] Lake water-level fluctuation forecasting using machine learning models: a systematic review
    Zhu, Senlin
    Lu, Hongfang
    Ptak, Mariusz
    Dai, Jiangyu
    Ji, Qingfeng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (36) : 44807 - 44819