Life cycle assessment of three typical solar energy utilization systems in different regions of China

被引:7
|
作者
Su, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Zehan [1 ]
Tian, Shaochen [1 ]
Chen, Chaoyang [1 ]
Huang, Yixiang [1 ]
Geng, Yining [1 ]
Chen, Junfeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Mech Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Solar water heaters; Photovoltaic panels; Photovoltaic; thermal systems; Life cycle assessment; Carbon emission; Environmental impacts; HOT-WATER SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; ASSESSMENT LCA; INDUSTRY; PAYBACK; EMISSIONS; HEATER; PV;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.127736
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the future, solar energy has a major impact on the transformation of energy supply, becoming an attractive option among renewable energy sources. This study compares three typical systems that use solar energy, namely solar water heater (SWH) systems, solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, and photovoltaic/thermal (PVT) systems, under comparable conditions in different regions of China. The comparison is based on a life cycle assessment (LCA), taking into consideration the climate characteristics and energy supply in different regions. The corresponding environmental impact assessment results were obtained using the endpoint method and sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the factors that had a greater impact on the results. The findings indicate that SWH systems are more suitable for the southwest of China, where the power grid structure is dominated by hydropower. PV systems are recommended for northern and northeastern China, where coal power is the main source. In other parts of China, both PVT and PV systems are good options. Taking Shanghai as an example, applying PVT systems in Shanghai can reduce carbon emissions by 11.0% and 55.9% respectively, as well as decrease the environmental impact by 11.1% and 38.9% throughout whole life cycle, compared to PV systems and SWH.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment comparison of three typical energy utilization ways for corn stover in China
    Su, Xing
    Shao, Xiaolu
    Tian, Shaochen
    Li, He
    Huang, Yixiang
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2021, 152
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of typical tower solar thermal power station in China
    Yang, Yuchen
    Ma, Lin
    Ma, Wenhui
    Yu, Zhiqiang
    Fu, Ling
    Li, Ming
    Mao, Dan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2024, 309
  • [3] Life Cycle Inventory and Assessment of different Solar Photovoltaic Systems
    Baharwani, Vishakha
    Meena, Neetu
    Dubey, Alka
    Sharma, Deepak
    Brighu, Urmila
    Mathur, Jyotirmay
    [J]. 2014 POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS CONFERENCE: TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014,
  • [4] Life cycle assessment on energy utilization technologies
    Wang, SJ
    Song, Q
    Chen, CG
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND APPLICATION, VOL I AND II, 2001, : 166 - 168
  • [5] An integrated life cycle assessment of different facade systems for a typical residential building in Ghana
    Ansah, Mark Kyeredey
    Chen, Xi
    Yang, Hongxing
    Lu, Lin
    Lam, Patrick T., I
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 53 (53)
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of a typical lead smelting process in China
    Gao, Wenyan
    Wu, Kaikai
    Wu, Chuan
    Chen, Hongren
    Li, Wai chin
    Xue, Shengguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 415
  • [7] Life Cycle Assessment of Typical Sanitary Ceramic Products in China
    Wang, Yanjing
    Liu, Yu
    Gong, Xianzheng
    Wang, Zhihong
    Gao, Feng
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS, 2018, : 545 - 554
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of solar energy conversion systems in energetic retrofitted buildings
    Martinopoulos, Georgios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2018, 20 : 256 - 263
  • [9] Life cycle energy assessment of a typical office building in Thailand
    Kofoworola, Oyeshola F.
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2009, 41 (10) : 1076 - 1083
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of three types of hydrogen production methods using solar energy
    Zhang, Jinxu
    Ling, Bo
    He, Yong
    Zhu, Yanqun
    Wang, Zhihua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (30) : 14158 - 14168