An analysis of key stakeholder policy perspectives in the proposed e-cigarette regulations in New Zealand

被引:1
|
作者
Hardie, Lucy [1 ,3 ]
McCool, Judith [1 ]
Freeman, Becky [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Sch Populat Hlth, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Auckland, Sch Populat Hlth, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
advertising; electronic delivery systems; MeSH compliant; marketing; nicotine; vaping; TOBACCO CONTROL;
D O I
10.1002/hpja.709
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Issue addressed: The use of e-cigarettes is increasing; New Zealand (NZ) has witnessed a rapid rise in consumption. Policymakers face a challenge to balance the impacts of regulation on those who use e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool while protecting people who do not smoke from the harms of e-cigarette use, particularly young people. Previous research has demonstrated varying perspectives on e-cigarette regulation according to different stakeholders and interest groups. This study examined key stakeholders' positions on the drafted legislation to regulate e-cigarettes in NZ.Methods: Using written submissions made during public consultation in 2020, we conducted a content analysis to determine levels of support for e-cigarette regulations. Submissions made by the e-cigarette industry and the health sector were included for analysis.Results: The tobacco industry is heavily invested in ensuring that e-cigarettes continue to be promoted and available in NZ with minimal restrictions. On the contrary, health organisations supported the introduction of regulations to reduce marketing to, and use of e-cigarettes by youth and people who do not smoke.Conclusions: The industry opposes restrictions using similar approaches employed against tobacco control measures. Despite perceptions of division, the health sector is generally unified in support of e-cigarette restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 882
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of supporting evidence by health and industry organisations in the consultation on e-cigarette regulations in New Zealand
    Hardie, Lucy
    McCool, Judith
    Freeman, Becky
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (09):
  • [2] E-cigarette regulation and policy: UK vapers' perspectives
    Farrimond, Hannah
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2016, 111 (06) : 1077 - 1083
  • [3] E-cigarette ban proposed in Toronto
    Miller, Adam
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2014, 186 (13) : E481 - E482
  • [4] E-cigarette policies in Aotearoa (New Zealand): An Indigenous perspective
    Waa, Andrew
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2024,
  • [5] E-cigarette regulations in Italy: fluctuating and confusing
    Capasso, Lorenzo
    Gualano, Maria Rosaria
    Flacco, Maria Elena
    Siliquini, Roberta
    Manzoli, Lamberto
    [J]. LANCET, 2014, 383 (9932): : 1883 - 1883
  • [6] Exploring Stakeholder and Parent Perspectives of a County Response to Adolescent Vaping and E-Cigarette Use
    Kurji, Natasha
    Koza, Thomas
    Sharp, Amanda
    Moore, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES, 2021, 51 (03) : 420 - 441
  • [7] E-cigarette Retail Licensing Policy and E-cigarette Use Among Adolescents
    Azagba, Sunday
    Shan, Lingpeng
    Latham, Keely
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2020, 66 (01) : 123 - 125
  • [8] Public reactions to e-cigarette regulations on Twitter: a text mining analysis
    Lazard, Allison J.
    Wilcox, Gary B.
    Tuttle, Hannah M.
    Glowacki, Elizabeth M.
    Pikowski, Jessica
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2017, 26 (E2) : e112 - e116
  • [9] An Analysis of E-Cigarette Marketing in New Zealand Tobacco Retail Outlets Prior to Legislative Change
    Bateman, Jerram
    Robertson, Lindsay A.
    Marsh, Louise
    Cameron, Claire
    Hoek, Janet
    [J]. NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (07) : 1221 - 1224
  • [10] More to Add to E-Cigarette Regulations Unified Approaches
    Cai, Hua
    Garcia, Joe G. N.
    Wang, Chen
    [J]. CHEST, 2020, 157 (04) : 771 - 773