Visual Acuity in Patients Requiring Intravitreal Injections: Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Delay in Care

被引:0
|
作者
Song, Weilin [1 ]
Kanyo, Emese [2 ]
Bastian, Riley [3 ]
Singh, Rishi P. [4 ,5 ]
Rachitskaya, Aleksandra V. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Stein Eye Inst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Northeast Ohio Med Univ, Rootstown, OH USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cole Eye Inst, Ctr Ophthalm Bioinformat, Cleveland Hts, OH USA
[5] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cole Eye Inst, Cleveland Hts, OH USA
[6] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cole Eye Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave,Mail Code i-32, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
anti-VEGF; delays in care; intravitreal injections; pandemic; retina; visual acuity; MACULAR EDEMA; RANIBIZUMAB; OUTCOMES; ANCHOR; MARINA;
D O I
10.1177/24741264221136637
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the short-term and long-term effects of a delay in care on visual acuity (VA) in patients requiring intravitreal injections. Methods: This retrospective cohort study comprised patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), or retinal vein occlusion (RVO) receiving intravitreal injections. The visual and anatomic outcomes at the next completed visit and at the 1-year follow-up were studied. Results: Of 1172 patients, 38% had a delay in care (mean 5.7 weeks). Compared with baseline, these patients lost VA (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) (mean -2.13 +/- 0.49 SE) in the short-term (P = .0003) and had a thicker central subfield. Patients with no delay in care had a net VA gain (0.97 +/- 0.39) (P = .0067). There was no difference in VA between 1 year and the baseline in either group. Long term, patients with nAMD in both groups had VA loss (no delay in care: -1.76 +/- 0.60; delayed care: -2.44 +/- 0.78) (P = .0005 and P = .0114, respectively). Patients with DME and no delay in care maintained gains in vision (4.68 +/- 1.86) but those with delayed care did not (1.72 +/- 2.24) (P = .0202 and P = .3756, respectively). In both groups, patients with RVO had no significant difference in vision from baseline. Conclusions: In patients requiring intravitreal injections, a delay in care of 5.7 weeks affected vision outcomes in the short term but not the long term.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 26
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条