A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction

被引:10
|
作者
Mohsen, Farida [1 ]
Al-Absi, Hamada R. H. [1 ]
Yousri, Noha A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
El Hajj, Nady [1 ,3 ]
Shah, Zubair [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Sci & Engn, Doha 34110, Qatar
[2] Qatar Fdn, Genet Med, Weill Cornell Med Qatar, Doha, Qatar
[3] Hamad Bin Khalifa Univ, Qatar Fdn, Coll Hlth & Life Sci, Doha 34110, Qatar
[4] Alexandria Univ, Comp & Syst Engn, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
MULTIMODAL DATA INTEGRATION; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; MODELS; POPULATION; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1038/s41746-023-00933-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated health complications highlight the need to develop predictive models for early diagnosis and intervention. While many artificial intelligence (AI) models for T2DM risk prediction have emerged, a comprehensive review of their advancements and challenges is currently lacking. This scoping review maps out the existing literature on AI-based models for T2DM prediction, adhering to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of longitudinal studies was conducted across four databases, including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE-Xplore, and Google Scholar. Forty studies that met our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Classical machine learning (ML) models dominated these studies, with electronic health records (EHR) being the predominant data modality, followed by multi-omics, while medical imaging was the least utilized. Most studies employed unimodal AI models, with only ten adopting multimodal approaches. Both unimodal and multimodal models showed promising results, with the latter being superior. Almost all studies performed internal validation, but only five conducted external validation. Most studies utilized the area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination measures. Notably, only five studies provided insights into the calibration of their models. Half of the studies used interpretability methods to identify key risk predictors revealed by their models. Although a minority highlighted novel risk predictors, the majority reported commonly known ones. Our review provides valuable insights into the current state and limitations of AI-based models for T2DM prediction and highlights the challenges associated with their development and clinical integration.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction
    Farida Mohsen
    Hamada R. H. Al-Absi
    Noha A. Yousri
    Nady El Hajj
    Zubair Shah
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 6
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for Prediction of Mortality in ICU Patients: A Scoping Review
    Olang, Orkideh
    Mohseni, Sana
    Shahabinezhad, Ali
    Hamidianshirazi, Yasaman
    Goli, Amireza
    Abolghasemian, Mansour
    Shafiee, Mohammad Ali
    Aarabi, Mehdi
    Alavinia, Mohammad
    Shaker, Pouyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence-Based Regional Flood Frequency Analysis Methods: A Scoping Review
    Zalnezhad, Amir
    Rahman, Ataur
    Nasiri, Nastaran
    Haddad, Khaled
    Rahman, Muhammad Muhitur
    Vafakhah, Mehdi
    Samali, Bijan
    Ahamed, Farhad
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [4] Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
    de Hond, Anne A. H.
    Leeuwenberg, Artuur M.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Kant, Ilse M. J.
    Nijman, Steven W. J.
    van Os, Hendrikus J. A.
    Aardoom, Jiska J.
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Schuit, Ewoud
    van Smeden, Maarten
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Chavannes, Niels H.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [5] Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
    Anne A. H. de Hond
    Artuur M. Leeuwenberg
    Lotty Hooft
    Ilse M. J. Kant
    Steven W. J. Nijman
    Hendrikus J. A. van Os
    Jiska J. Aardoom
    Thomas P. A. Debray
    Ewoud Schuit
    Maarten van Smeden
    Johannes B. Reitsma
    Ewout W. Steyerberg
    Niels H. Chavannes
    Karel G. M. Moons
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence-based Learning Techniques for Diabetes Prediction: Challenges and Systematic Review
    Kaul S.
    Kumar Y.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 2020, 1 (6)
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence-Based Consumer Health Informatics Application: Scoping Review
    Asan, Onur
    Choi, Euiji
    Wang, Xiaomei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [8] An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction
    Ran Liu
    Miye Wang
    Tao Zheng
    Rui Zhang
    Nan Li
    Zhongxiu Chen
    Hongmei Yan
    Qingke Shi
    [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 23
  • [9] An artificial intelligence-based risk prediction model of myocardial infarction
    Liu, Ran
    Wang, Miye
    Zheng, Tao
    Zhang, Rui
    Li, Nan
    Chen, Zhongxiu
    Yan, Hongmei
    Shi, Qingke
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Integrating Local and Global Features for Brain Cancer Imaging: Scoping Review
    Ali, Hazrat
    Qureshi, Rizwan
    Shah, Zubair
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 11