Emotion Regulation and Combat Severity Differentiates PTSD Diagnostic Status Among Veterans

Objective: This study examined whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnostic groups in veterans were differentiated by combat severity and specific avoidance and approach-related emotion regulation (ER) strategies. Method: In a cohort study, 725 participants (M-age = 58.39, SD = 11.27, 94.5% male, 58.2% White) recruited from VHA facilities completed the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), Combat Exposure Scale (CES), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Participants were categorized into three PTSD groups: Current, Remitted, and Never. Results: Multinomial logistic regressions adjusting for age, sex, and race, showed combat severity significantly differentiated all groups from each other (ps < .001). Specifically, combat severity was significantly associated with increased odds of Current PTSD versus Remitted (OR: 1.02, 95% CI [1.01, 1.05]) and Never PTSD (OR: 1.14, [1.12, 1.17]) and odds of Remitted compared with Never PTSD (OR: 1.11, [1.09, 1.14]). Suppression, but not reappraisal, was significantly associated with increased odds of Current PTSD compared with Remitted (OR: 1.15, [1.06, 1.24]) and Never PTSD (OR: 1.14, [1.06, 1.22]; ps < .001). Lower reappraisal was only significantly associated with the likelihood of Remitted PTSD compared with Never PTSD (OR: 0.93, [0.88, 0.99], p = .03). Conclusions: Increasing levels of combat severity differentiated veterans with current, remitted, and no history of PTSD, suggesting screening for severity of combat may be helpful. Greater habitual suppression distinguished current versus non-current PTSD status, whereas only less reappraisal distinguished non-current groups from each other. Lower suppression may be an important treatment target for veterans with moderate and high combat severity.