Corrupted by Algorithms? How AI-generated and Human-written Advice Shape (Dis)honesty

被引:7
|
作者
Leib, Margarita [1 ]
Koebis, Nils [2 ]
Rilke, Rainer Michael [3 ]
Hagens, Marloes [4 ]
Irlenbusch, Bernd [5 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[2] Max Planck Inst Human Dev, Berlin, Germany
[3] WHU Otto Beisheim Sch Management, Vallendar, Germany
[4] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management RSM, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
ECONOMIC JOURNAL | 2024年 / 134卷 / 658期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; PEOPLE; JUSTIFICATIONS; DISHONESTY; JUDGMENT; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1093/ej/uead056
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence increasingly becomes an indispensable advisor. New ethical concerns arise if artificial intelligence persuades people to behave dishonestly. In an experiment, we study how artificial intelligence advice (generated by a natural language processing algorithm) affects (dis)honesty, compare it to equivalent human advice and test whether transparency about the advice source matters. We find that dishonesty-promoting advice increases dishonesty, whereas honesty-promoting advice does not increase honesty. This is the case for both artificial intelligence and human advice. Algorithmic transparency, a commonly proposed policy to mitigate artificial intelligence risks, does not affect behaviour. The findings mark the first steps towards managing artificial intelligence advice responsibly.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 784
页数:19
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers
    Hsu, Tien-Wei
    Tseng, Ping-Tao
    Tsai, Shih-Jen
    Ko, Chih-Hung
    Thompson, Trevor
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Yang, Fu-Chi
    Tsai, Chia-Kuang
    Tu, Yu-Kang
    Yang, Szu-Nian
    Liang, Chih-Sung
    Su, Kuan-Pin
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2024, 341
  • [2] Human-Written vs AI-Generated Texts in Orthopedic Academic Literature: Comparative Qualitative Analysis
    Hakam, Hassan Tarek
    Prill, Robert
    Korte, Lisa
    Lovrekovi, Bruno
    Ostoji, Marko
    Ramadanov, Nikolai
    Muehlensiepen, Felix
    [J]. JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [3] SEEING IT IN THE FLESCH: COMPARING READABILITY BETWEEN AI-GENERATED AND HUMAN-WRITTEN PLAIN-LANGUAGE ABSTRACTS
    McMinn, D.
    Valena, T.
    Bender, W.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S11 - S11
  • [4] Comparison of an AI-Generated Case Report With a Human-Written Case Report: Practical Considerations for AI-Assisted Medical Writing
    Pinto, Denver S.
    Noronha, Sharon M.
    Saigal, Gaurav
    Quencer, Robert M.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [5] Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry
    Kobis, Nils
    Mossink, Luca D.
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 114
  • [6] Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks
    Grassini, Simone
    Koivisto, Mika
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [7] Understanding how personality traits, experiences, and attitudes shape negative bias toward AI-generated artworks
    Simone Grassini
    Mika Koivisto
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 14