Demystifying the Cost of Serverless Computing: Towards a Win-Win Deal

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Fangming [1 ,2 ]
Niu, Yipei [3 ]
机构
[1] Peng Cheng Lab, Shenzhen 518066, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Natl Engn Res Ctr Big Data Technol & Syst, Cluster & Grid Comp Lab, Serv Comp Technol & Syst Lab,Sch Comp Sci & Techno, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Serverless; FaaS; cost model; pricing; auction;
D O I
10.1109/TPDS.2023.3330849
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Serverless is an emerging computing paradigm that greatly simplifies the development, deployment, and maintenance of cloud applications. However, due to potential cost issues brought by the widely adopted pricing, it is difficult to answer how to use and operate serverless computing services from the perspectives of users and providers. To demystify the cost of serverless computing, we present one of the first studies that develops an analytical model for serverless cost from the perspectives of users and providers, by comparing it to Infrastructure-as-a-Service. Based on the model, driven by real-world traces, extensive simulation results verify the following cost issues: 1) For the users, serverless is not always cost-saving, even possibly leading to expense explosion; 2) The serverless providers are in urgent need of widening use scenarios to improve resource utilization and raise revenue; 3) The prevailing pricing fails to neither reduce the risk of expense explosion nor meet the need of attracting more workloads. To remove the cost barrier, we propose future function, auction-based pricing for serverless, to offer discounts to the users as well as boost profit for the providers. Experimental results show the duration price of functions can be reduced by 57.5% on average for 13.5% of users yet without harming the revenue of providers.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 72
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A WIN-WIN DEAL
    TRUE, WR
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1993, 91 (36) : 19 - 19
  • [2] The Art of the Win-Win Deal
    Colbert-Lewis, Danielle
    [J]. SERIALS REVIEW, 2019, 45 (03) : 146 - 147
  • [3] Program Analysis and Machine Learning: A Win-Win Deal
    Nori, Aditya V.
    Rajamani, Sriram K.
    [J]. STATIC ANALYSIS, 2011, 6887 : 2 - 3
  • [4] A Win-win Deal: Towards Sparse and Robust Pre-trained Language Models
    Liu, Yuanxin
    Meng, Fandong
    Lin, Zheng
    Li, Jiangnan
    Fu, Peng
    Cao, Yanan
    Wang, Weiping
    Zhou, Jie
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 35 (NEURIPS 2022), 2022,
  • [5] A Win-Win?
    Kaebnick, Gregory E.
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2013, 43 (04) : 2 - 2
  • [6] Win-Win
    Mlinko, Ange
    [J]. POETRY, 2009, 194 (03) : 214 - 215
  • [7] Reducing weight and cost: A win-win approach for steel
    Pachura, E
    [J]. IISI-31 CONFERENCE PAPERS, 1997, : 9 - 23
  • [8] The benefit of a win-win strategy for cost reduction of maintenance
    Wikberg, L
    [J]. SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS 1 & 2, 1999, : 1055 - 1060
  • [9] Win-Win Negotiation
    Meek, Julie A.
    [J]. CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2015, 29 (03) : 145 - 146
  • [10] Photovoltaic win-win
    Brown, Alastair
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2019, 9 (01) : 7 - 7