The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Xiaqing [1 ]
Zhao, Jialian [1 ]
Tu, Haiya [1 ]
Chen, Kunwei [1 ]
Hu, Yaoqin [1 ]
Jin, Yue [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Midazolam; Procedural sedation; Pediatric; Age; CHLORAL HYDRATE; CHILDREN; COMBINATION; EFFICACY; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s00431-023-05240-5
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Procedural sedation for diagnostic examination is a common practice in children. The study aims to analyze the sedative effect and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam in outpatient pediatric procedural sedation across different age groups and to assess the incidence of sedation failure. From February 2021 to September 2021, children who underwent procedural sedation were retrospectively enrolled. The children were divided into 4 groups based on age: the infant group (0 to 1 year old), toddler group (1 to 3 years old), preschool group (3 to 6 years old), and school-age group (6 to 12 years old). Two-mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine and 0.5-mg/kg oral midazolam were used for sedation. The sedation success rate after rescue, sedation success rate, onset time of sedation, and the sedation time were recorded. The incidence of adverse events and the risk factors for sedation failure were also analyzed. A total of 4758 patients were identified. After exclusion, 3149 patients were ultimately enrolled. The combination of 2-mcg/kg intranasal dexmedetomidine and 0.5-mg/kg oral midazolam resulted in a total success rate of 99.7% and a sedation success rate of 91.4%. The sedation success rate varied among the four groups: 90.2% in the infant group, 93.1% in the toddler group, 92.7% in the preschool group, and 78.4% in the school-age group. The sedation success rate was significantly lower in the school-age group compared to the other three groups (P < 0.001). The onset time of sedation was shorter in infant (22 min, IQR: 18-28 min, P < 0.001) and longer in the school-age group (30 min, IQR: 25-35 min, P < 0.05). Additionally, the infants had a longer sedation time (110 min, IQR: 90-135 min, P < 0.001) and a higher rate of delayed recovery (27.5%, all P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was low (4.70%), which bradycardia (2.03%) being the most common. Age (0-1 year and > 6 years), weight, ASA class II, and history of failed sedation were identified as risk factors of sedation failure.Conclusion: Intranasal administration of 2-mcg/kg dexmedetomidine combined with oral administration of 0.5-mg/kg midazolam was found to be efficient and safety for pediatric procedural sedation. Different age groups of children exhibited distinct sedation characteristics, and age was identified as a risk factor affecting the efficacy of sedation.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 177
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Xiaqing Zhou
    Jialian Zhao
    Haiya Tu
    Kunwei Chen
    Yaoqin Hu
    Yue Jin
    [J]. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2024, 183 : 169 - 177
  • [2] Combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam as sedation for pediatric MRI
    Cozzi, Giorgio
    Monasta, Lorenzo
    Maximova, Natalia
    Poropat, Federico
    Magnolato, Andrea
    Sbisa, Eugenio
    Norbedo, Stefania
    Sternissa, Giuliana
    Zanon, Davide
    Barbi, Egidio
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 27 (09) : 976 - 977
  • [3] Predictors of pediatric sedation failure with initial dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Cui, Yu
    Gong, Tianqing
    Mu, Qixia
    Wu, Qunying
    Kang, Lu
    Chen, Qin
    He, Yani
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 94 (06) : 2054 - 2061
  • [4] Predictors of pediatric sedation failure with initial dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Yu Cui
    Tianqing Gong
    Qixia Mu
    Qunying Wu
    Lu Kang
    Qin Chen
    Yani He
    [J]. Pediatric Research, 2023, 94 : 2054 - 2061
  • [5] Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Francesca Cossovel
    Andrea Trombetta
    Augusto Ramondo
    Guglielmo Riccio
    Luca Ronfani
    Alessia Saccari
    Giorgio Cozzi
    Egidio Barbi
    [J]. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 48
  • [6] Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine association allows shorter induction time for pediatric sedation compared to intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam
    Cossovel, Francesca
    Trombetta, Andrea
    Ramondo, Augusto
    Riccio, Guglielmo
    Ronfani, Luca
    Saccari, Alessia
    Cozzi, Giorgio
    Barbi, Egidio
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 48 (01)
  • [7] Procedural sedation in children for fractionated radiation treatment: Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam and ketamine
    Das, Rekha
    Das, Rajat
    Jena, Manoranjan
    Janka, Janaki
    Mishra, Sunita
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (10) : 687 - 693
  • [8] INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS A PRIMARY PEDIATRIC PROCEDURAL SEDATION MEDICATION
    Behrle, Natalie
    Birisci, Esma
    Anderson, Jordan
    Schroeder, Sara
    Dalabih, Abdallah
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 42 (12)
  • [9] Combination of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Sedation in Pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Palmese, Salvatore
    Bilancio, Giancarlo
    Caterino, Vittorio
    De Anseris, Anna Giulia
    Perciato, Stanislao
    Siglioccolo, Antonio
    Gammaldi, Renato
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2024, 40 (06) : 430 - 433
  • [10] Randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of intranasal or oral ketamine-midazolam combinations compared to oral midazolam for outpatient pediatric sedation
    Sado-Filho, Joji
    Viana, Karolline Alves
    Correa-Faria, Patricia
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    Costa, Paulo Sucasas
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):