Immersed Boundary Methods: Historical Perspective and Future Outlook

被引:42
|
作者
Verzicco, Roberto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento Ingn Ind DII, Rome, Italy
[2] Gran Sasso Sci Inst, Laquila, Italy
[3] Univ Twente, Phys Fluids Grp, Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
immersed boundary methods; complex flows; wall models; multiphysics problems; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; FLUID-STRUCTURE-INTERACTION; FULLY RESOLVED SIMULATIONS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOWS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; RIGID BODIES; HEART-VALVES; PENALIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; AERODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-022129
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Immersed boundary methods (IBMs) are versatile and efficient computational techniques to solve flow problems in complex geometric configurations that retain the simplicity and efficiency of Cartesian structured meshes. Although these methods became known in the 1970s and gained credibility only in the new millennium, they had already been conceived and implemented at the beginning of the 1960s, even if the early computers of those times did not allow researchers to exploit their potential. Nowadays IBMs are established numerical schemes employed for the solution of many complex problems in which fluid mechanics may account for only part of the multiphysics dynamics. Despite the indisputable advantages, these methods also have drawbacks, and each problem should be carefully analyzed before deciding which particular IBM implementation is most suitable and whether additional modeling is necessary. High-Reynolds number flows constitute one of the main limitations of IBMs owing to the resolution of thin wall shear layers, which cannot benefit from anisotropic grid refinement at the boundaries. To alleviate this weakness, researchers have developed IBM-compliant wall models and local grid refinement strategies, although in these cases possible pitfalls must also be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 155
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条