Biodiversity and spatial distribution of ascidian using environmental DNA metabarcoding

被引:4
|
作者
Bae, Seongjun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Philjae [3 ,4 ]
Yi, Chang -Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Marine Biodivers Inst Korea, Dept Ecol & Conservat, Seocheon 33662, South Korea
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Coll Nat Sci, Dept Ocean Environm Sci, Daejeon 34134, South Korea
[3] Natl Marine Biodivers Inst Korea, Dept Biodivers, Seocheon 33662, South Korea
[4] Kunsan Natl Univ, Dept Marine Biotechnol, Kunsan 54150, South Korea
关键词
eDNA; Biodiversity; Biomonitoring; Invasive species; Cryptic species; Barcoding gap; IDENTIFICATION; DIVERSITY; TUNICATA; PROTOCOL; SEARCH; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105893
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Monitoring studies are necessary to understand the biodiversity of marine ecosystems and are useful for iden-tifying and managing rare or invasive species. Because monitoring has traditionally relied only on visual surveys (e.g., trapping, netting, electrofishing, and SCUBA diving) with limited time and physical resources, environ-mental DNA (eDNA) analysis is being applied as an efficient monitoring method. This study compared whether the eDNA metabarcoding technique can replace the traditional visual survey in an ascidian fauna study. We designed ascidian-specific primers and identified a clear gap (3.75%) by barcoding gap analysis. Then, we collected seawater samples for eDNA analysis during the summer (August-September) of 2021 at three sites (Mokpo, Yeosu, and Uljin) in South Korea. In the survey sites of this study, 25 species were observed through literature and visual survey, among which 9 species were detected by metabarcoding and 16 species were not detected. On the other hand, 10 species were detected only by metabarcoding, and one of them was identified as Pyura mirabilis, an unrecorded species in South Korea. This study succeeded in detecting cryptic or rare species with one seawater collection, which can be used to determine their unexplored habitat. Therefore, we conclude that monitoring using eDNA is more efficient than visual surveys for detecting rare or cryptic ascidian species. We also suggest that, when combined with traditional monitoring methods, it could be a tool to complement ascidian fauna studies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of fish biodiversity in estuaries using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Ahn, Hyojin
    Kume, Manabu
    Terashima, Yuki
    Ye, Feng
    Kameyama, Satoshi
    Miya, Masaki
    Yamashita, Yoh
    Kasai, Akihide
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [2] Environmental DNA metabarcoding: an approach for biodiversity monitoring
    Padilla-Garcia, Cinthia Yedith
    Camacho-Sanchez, Fatima Yedith
    Reyes-Lopez, Miguel Angel
    [J]. CIENCIAUAT, 2021, 16 (01) : 136 - 149
  • [3] Environmental DNA metabarcoding to investigate historic changes in biodiversity
    Pansu, Johan
    Giguet-Covex, Charline
    Ficetola, Francesco
    Gielly, Ludovic
    Boyer, Frederic
    Coissac, Eric
    Domaizon, Isabelle
    Zinger, Lucie
    Poulenard, Jerome
    Arnaud, Fabien
    [J]. GENOME, 2015, 58 (05) : 264 - 264
  • [4] Testing multiple substrates for terrestrial biodiversity monitoring using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    van der Heyde, Mieke
    Bunce, Michael
    Wardell-Johnson, Grant
    Fernandes, Kristen
    White, Nicole E.
    Nevill, Paul
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2020, 20 (03) : 732 - 745
  • [5] Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Valentini, Alice
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Miaud, Claude
    Civade, Raphael
    Herder, Jelger
    Thomsen, Philip Francis
    Bellemain, Eva
    Besnard, Aurelien
    Coissac, Eric
    Boyer, Frederic
    Gaboriaud, Coline
    Jean, Pauline
    Poulet, Nicolas
    Roset, Nicolas
    Copp, Gordon H.
    Geniez, Philippe
    Pont, Didier
    Argillier, Christine
    Baudoin, Jean-Marc
    Peroux, Tiphaine
    Crivelli, Alain J.
    Olivier, Anthony
    Acqueberge, Manon
    Le Brun, Matthieu
    Moller, Peter R.
    Willerslev, Eske
    Dejean, Tony
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2016, 25 (04) : 929 - 942
  • [6] Assessment of fish biodiversity in four Korean rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Alam, Md Jobaidul
    Kim, Nack-Keun
    Andriyono, Sapto
    Choi, Hee-kyu
    Lee, Ji-Hyun
    Kim, Hyun-Woo
    [J]. PEERJ, 2020, 8
  • [7] Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System
    Civade, Raphael
    Dejean, Tony
    Valentini, Alice
    Roset, Nicolas
    Raymond, Jean-Claude
    Bonin, Aurelie
    Taberlet, Pierre
    Pont, Didier
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [8] Spatial abundance and distribution of picocyanobacterial communities in two contrasting lakes revealed using environmental DNA metabarcoding
    Schallenberg, Lena A.
    Pearman, John K.
    Burns, Carolyn W.
    Wood, Susanna A.
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2021, 97 (07)
  • [9] Marine Vertebrate Biodiversity and Distribution Within the Central California Current Using Environmental DNA (eDNA) Metabarcoding and Ecosystem Surveys
    Closek, Collin J.
    Santora, Jarrod A.
    Starks, Hilary A.
    Schroeder, Isaac D.
    Andruszkiewicz, Elizabeth A.
    Sakuma, Keith M.
    Bograd, Steven J.
    Hazenv, Elliott L.
    Field, John C.
    Boehm, Alexandria B.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [10] Environmental DNA metabarcoding describes biodiversity across marine gradients
    Adams, Clare I. M.
    Jeunen, Gert-Jan
    Cross, Hugh
    Taylor, Helen R.
    Bagnaro, Antoine
    Currie, Kim
    Hepburn, Chris
    Gemmell, Neil J.
    Urban, Lara
    Baltar, Federico
    Stat, Michael
    Bunce, Michael
    Knapp, Michael
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 80 (04) : 953 - 971