Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in landfill leachate: Concurrence, removal and the influencing factors

被引:4
|
作者
He, Xiao-Song [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Qi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xi, Bei-Dou [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Jing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Qing-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Yue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Environm Protect Key Lab Simulat & Control G, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Guilin 541000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Landfill leachate; Volatile organic compounds; Semi-volatile organic compounds; Concentration distribution; Removal characteristics; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; MICROPOLLUTANTS; FATE; GROUNDWATER; SUBSTANCES; FILTRATION; REJECTION; OXIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2023.120566
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds (VOCs and SVOCs) carried by landfilled wastes may enter leachate, and require appropriate treatment before discharge. However, the driving factors of the entry of VOCs and SOVCs into leachate, their removal characteristics during leachate treatment and the dominant factors remain unclear. A global survey of the VOCs and SOVCs in leachate from 103 landfill sites combined with 27 articles on leachate treatment was conducted to clarify the abovementioned question. The results showed that SVOCs such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phthalate acid esters (PAEs) and phenols were the most frequently detected in leachate on a global scale. However, four kinds of VOCs, i.e., toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes and benzene, were frequently detected at high concentrations in landfill leachate as well. The concentrations of VOCs and SVOCs in leachate ranged from 1 x 10(0) to 1 x 10(8) ng/L. Solubility was a key factor driving the entry of VOCs and SOVCs into leachate, and higher solubility enables higher detectable concentrations in leachate (P<0.05). It was easiest to remove monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (MAHs) from leachate, followed by phenols and PAHs, and it was most difficult to remove PAEs. In terms of removing MAHs, the anoxic/oxic (A/ O) process and the sequential batch reactor (SBR) process were comparable to the advanced oxidization process and far superior to the ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes, and the removal rate increased with an increase in the Henry's constant and/or the hydrophilicity of the contaminants during the A/O and SBR processes (P<0.05). There were no significant differences among biological, advanced oxidation and reverse osmosis processes in the removal of phenolic. In terms of removing PAHs, the A/O process was comparable to the advanced oxidization process and more efficient than the other treatment processes. As to removing PAEs, the membrane bioreactor process was almost the same efficient as the advanced oxidization process and far more efficient than the other biological treatment processes. Future research should focus on the pollution of atmospheric VOCs and SVOCs near aeration units in leachate treatment plants, as well as the health risk assessment of VOCs and SVOCs in the treated leachate effluent. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review regarding the occurrence and removal of VOCs and SVOCs from landfill leachates worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in landfill gas: Composition characteristics and health risks
    Pan, Qi
    Liu, Qing-Yu
    Zheng, Jing
    Li, Yan-Hong
    Xiang, Song
    Sun, Xiao-Jie
    He, Xiao-Song
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 174
  • [2] Unrecognized volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds from brake wear
    Perraud, V.
    Blake, D. R.
    Wingen, L. M.
    Barletta, B.
    Bauer, P. S.
    Campos, J.
    Ezell, M. J.
    Guenther, A.
    Johnson, K. N.
    Lee, M.
    Meinardi, S.
    Patterson, J.
    Saltzman, E. S.
    Thomas, A. E.
    Smith, J. N.
    Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2024, 26 (05) : 928 - 941
  • [3] Understanding semi-volatile organic compounds in indoor dust
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    [J]. INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (02) : 291 - 298
  • [4] An electrospray membrane probe for the analysis of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds in water
    VanHassel, Emily
    Bier, Mark E.
    [J]. RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2007, 21 (03) : 413 - 420
  • [5] Snow - a photobiochemical exchange platform for volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds with the atmosphere
    Ariya, P. A.
    Domine, F.
    Kos, G.
    Amyot, M.
    Cote, V.
    Vali, H.
    Lauzier, T.
    Kuhs, W. F.
    Techmer, K.
    Heinrichs, T.
    Mortazavi, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 8 (01) : 62 - 73
  • [6] Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds measured in Bayou Lafourche, southeastern Louisiana
    Wroblewski, S
    Mandhare, KS
    Beck, MJ
    Beck, JN
    [J]. MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 61 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [7] Indoor volatile and semi-volatile organic toxic compounds: Need for global action
    Sonne, Christian
    Xia, Changlei
    Dadvand, Payam
    Targino, Admir Creso
    Lam, Su Shiung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 62
  • [8] Analysis of semi-volatile or volatile organic compounds in air with mass spectrometry.
    Liu, B
    Wen, HY
    Yu, AM
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 227 : U373 - U373
  • [9] Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds of respiratory health relevance in French dwellings
    Dallongeville, A.
    Costet, N.
    Zmirou-Navier, D.
    Le Bot, B.
    Chevrier, C.
    Deguen, S.
    Annesi-Maesano, I.
    Blanchard, O.
    [J]. INDOOR AIR, 2016, 26 (03) : 426 - 438
  • [10] Passive air sampling of semi-volatile organic compounds
    Tuduri, Ludovic
    Millet, Maurice
    Briand, Olivier
    Montury, Michel
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 31 : 38 - 49