Exercise-based interventions for cancer cachexia: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials

被引:3
|
作者
Cheung, Canaan [1 ]
Boocock, Emily [2 ]
Grande, Antonio J. [3 ]
Maddocks, Matthew [2 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Cicely Saunders Inst Palliat Care Policy & Rehabi, London, England
[3] Univ Estadual Mato Grosso Do Sul, Dept Med, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
基金
“创新英国”项目;
关键词
Cancer; Cachexia; Exercise; Function; Physical activity; REHABILITATION PROGRAM; PATIENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100335
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: Cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterised by involuntary weight loss and functional limitation. There is a strong theoretical rationale for the use of exercise in the management of cachexia, and evidence of benefit from exercise in general cancer patients. However, clinical studies of exercise interventions in cancer cachexia are limited. We aimed to synthesise current evidence on the delivery, acceptability, safety and outcomes of exercise interventions for adults with cancer cachexia. Methods: We conducted a systematic review. Four databases were searched up to February 2023 for randomised (RCTs) and non-randomised (NRCTs) controlled studies. Eligibility and quality were independently assessed by two authors. Data on intervention components and structure, participant flow and adherence were tabulated. Clinical outcome data on body stature and composition, muscle strength, functional performance, and health-related quality of life were synthesised using effect direction plots. Results: Twelve studies (9 RCTs, 3 NRCTs) involving a total of 898 patients (study range 20-374) as part of a multicomponent approach. Median programme completion was 75% (range 43%-100%) and adherence was generally high. Five adverse events were considered possibly related to an intervention, including muscle or joint pain, breathlessness on exertion. Overall, 12/16 (75%) outcomes demonstrated a positive direction of effect on body stature and composition, 8/10 (80%) on muscle strength, 14/22 (64%) on functional performance, and 3/8 (38%) on health-related quality of life. Multicomponent interventions showed more consistent effects on body stature, and resistance training interventions on muscle strength. Conclusions: Exercise interventions appear to be safe and acceptable to people with cancer cachexia. Positive effects from exercise are more consistently observed for body stature or composition and muscle strength outcomes, than in functional capacity and health-related quality of life. The synergistic effects of exercise with other cachexia interventions, including drugs, should be examined in future robust studies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exercise-based interventions for cancer cachexia: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
    Cheung, Canaan
    Boocock, Emily
    Grande, Antonio J.
    Maddocks, Matthew
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 10
  • [2] Psychosocial interventions in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials and non-controlled studies
    Velez Toral, Mercedes
    Godoy-Izquierdo, Debora
    Padial Garcia, Ana
    Lara Moreno, Raquel
    Mendoza Ladron de Guevara, Nicolas
    Salamanca Ballesteros, Alberto
    de Teresa Galvan, Carlos
    Godoy Garcia, Juan F.
    [J]. MATURITAS, 2014, 77 (02) : 93 - 110
  • [3] The Effect of Perioperative E-Health Interventions on the Postoperative Course: A Systematic Review of Randomised and Non-Randomised Controlled Trials
    van der Meij, Eva
    Anema, Johannes R.
    Otten, Rene H. J.
    Huirne, Judith A. F.
    Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [4] Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Elfeky, Adel
    Gillies, Katie
    Gardner, Heidi
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Ishaku, Timothy
    Treweek, Shaun
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [5] The effectiveness of art therapy for anxiety in adults: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
    Abbing, Annemarie
    Ponstein, Anne
    van Hooren, Susan
    de Sonneville, Leo
    Swaab, Hanna
    Baars, Erik
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [6] Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Adel Elfeky
    Katie Gillies
    Heidi Gardner
    Cynthia Fraser
    Timothy Ishaku
    Shaun Treweek
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [7] Evaluating the effect of exercise-based interventions on functioning in people with transdiagnostic depressive symptoms: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Garcia-Estela, Aitana
    Angarita-Osorio, Natalia
    Holzhausen, Marlene Charlotte
    Mora-Salgueiro, Javier
    Perez, Victor
    Duarte, Esther
    Faulkner, Guy
    Colom, Francesc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 351 : 231 - 242
  • [8] Effectiveness of hospital clowns for symptom management in paediatrics: systematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials
    Lopes-Junior, Luis Carlos
    Bomfim, Emiliana
    Olson, Karin
    Neves, Eliane Tatsch
    Calheiros Silveira, Denise Sayuri
    Rodrigues Nunes, Michelle Darezzo
    Nascimento, Lucila Castanheira
    Pereira-da-Silva, Gabriela
    Garcia Lima, Regina Aparecida
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
  • [9] A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention to randomised controlled trials
    El Feky, Adel
    Gillies, Katie
    Gardner, Heidi
    Fraser, Cynthia
    Treweek, Shaun
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [10] A protocol for a systematic review of non-randomised evaluations of strategies to improve participant recruitment to randomised controlled trials
    Gardner H.R.
    Fraser C.
    MacLennan G.
    Treweek S.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)