The inverted U-shaped relationship between performance appraisal interval and proactive work behavior: The dual time frame effect

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Jun [1 ]
Ma, Jun [1 ]
Li, Liping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Tourism Univ, Hilton Sch Hosp Management, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY | 2023年 / 51卷 / 12期
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
performance appraisal; performance appraisal interval; proactive work behavior; delayed gratification; perceived uncertainty;
D O I
10.2224/sbp.12725
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In consideration of how to promote employees' work proactivity in the time frame of performance appraisals, we focused on a time-related construct called the performance appraisal interval (PAI). Drawing from psychological momentum theory, we constructed a model of the dual effect of the PAI on employees' proactive work behavior. A cross-level analysis of 561 employees from 55 groups indicated that PAI was positively related to delayed gratification, but the effect decreased gradually as time passed. Delayed gratification was positively related to proactive work behavior and mediated the relationship between PAI and proactive work behavior. Second, PAI was positively related to perceived uncertainty and the effect gradually increased over time. Perceived uncertainty was negatively related to proactive work behavior and mediated the relationship between PAI and proactive work behavior. In this study we found a compatible explanatory mechanism to integrate the positive and negative effects of a given PAI, which provides a new explanatory mechanism for stimulating proactive work behavior.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AROUSAL AND PERFORMANCE - AN INVERTED U-SHAPED RELATIONSHIP
    APPEL, MA
    HOLROYD, KA
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 17 (03) : 302 - 302
  • [2] Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness
    Montani, Francesco
    Vandenberghe, Christian
    Khedhaouria, Anis
    Courcy, Francois
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2020, 73 (01) : 59 - 93
  • [3] Evidence of an Inverted U-Shaped Relationship between Stakeholder Management Performance Variation and Firm Performance
    Laplume, Andre O.
    Harrison, Jeffrey S.
    Zhang, Zhou
    Yu, Xin
    Walker, Kent
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2022, 32 (02) : 272 - 298
  • [4] Assortment Size and Performance of Online Sellers: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship
    He, Yumei
    Guo, Xunhua
    Chen, Guoqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2019, 20 (10): : 1503 - 1530
  • [5] Customer concentration and supplier financial performance: An inverted U-shaped relationship
    Han, Zhaojun
    Yu, Conghui
    Li, Yanxi
    Shi, Jinyan
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 113 : 138 - 152
  • [6] The inverted U-shaped relationship between authentic leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior
    Niu, Chenchen
    Liang, Fu
    Meng, Xiangxiang
    Liu, Yao Ocean
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2020, 48 (11):
  • [7] The relationship between performance appraisal interval and employees' proactive working behavior - analysis based on time-gain effect and time-loss effect
    Yang, Jun
    Ma, Jun
    Li, Liping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Is there an inverted U-shaped, relationship between job demands and work engagement The moderating role of social support?
    Sawang, Sukanlaya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2012, 33 (02) : 178 - 186
  • [9] Is there an inverse U-shaped relationship between pay and performance?
    Kuo, Hsien-Chang
    Lin, Dan
    Lien, Donald
    Wang, Lie-Huey
    Yeh, Li-Jen
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2014, 28 : 347 - 357
  • [10] Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: Meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships
    Sturman, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2003, 29 (05) : 609 - 640